Add latest repo-consistency agent and apply TemplateDotNetTool improvements (PRs #61–#77)

.cspell.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+---
+# Spell-Checking
+#
+# PURPOSE:
+# - Maintain professional documentation and code quality
+# - Catch spelling errors before publication
+# - Support consistent technical terminology usage
+# - Misspelled words should be fixed in the source
+# - NEVER add a misspelled word to the 'words' list
+# - PROPOSE only genuine technical terms/names as needed
+
+version: "0.2"
+language: en
+
+# Project-specific technical terms and tool names
+words:
+  - Anson
+  - Blockquotes
+  - buildmark
+  - BuildMark
+  - build_notes
+  - camelcase
+  - Checkmarx
+  - codeql
+  - CodeQL
+  - copilot
+  - creatordate
+  - cspell
+  - csproj
+  - dbproj
+  - dcterms
+  - Dema
+  - demaconsulting
+  - DEMACONSULTINGNUGETKEY
+  - Dependabot
+  - dependabot
+  - doctitle
+  - dotnet
+  - editorconfig
+  - filepart
+  - fsproj
+  - Gidget
+  - gitattributes
+  - ibiqlik
+  - LINQ
+  - maintainer
+  - markdownlint
+  - mermaid
+  - mstest
+  - myterm
+  - ncipollo
+  - nuget
+  - nupkg
+  - oneline
+  - opencover
+  - pandoc
+  - pagetitle
+  - Pylint
+  - Qube
+  - reqstream
+  - ReqStream
+  - code_quality
+  - code_review_plan
+  - code_review_report
+  - requirements_doc
+  - requirements_report
+  - reviewmark
+  - ReviewMark
+  - Sarif
+  - SarifMark
+  - SBOM
+  - sbom
+  - Semgrep
+  - semver
+  - slnx
+  - snupkg
+  - sonarmark
+  - SonarMark
+  - SonarQube
+  - spdx
+  - streetsidesoftware
+  - TMPL
+  - trace_matrix
+  - triaging
+  - Trivy
+  - trx
+  - vbproj
+  - vcxproj
+  - versionmark
+  - Weasyprint
+  - yamllint
+
+# Exclude common build artifacts, dependencies, and vendored third-party code
+ignorePaths:
+  - "**/.git/**"
+  - "**/node_modules/**"
+  - "**/.venv/**"
+  - "**/thirdparty/**"
+  - "**/third-party/**"
+  - "**/3rd-party/**"
+  - "**/AGENT_REPORT_*.md"
+  - "**/.agent-logs/**"
+  - "**/bin/**"
+  - "**/obj/**"
+  - package-lock.json

.gitattributes

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# Set default behavior: normalize line endings to LF on checkout for all text files.
+# This ensures consistent SHA256 fingerprints for reviewmark across all platforms.
+* text=auto eol=lf
+
+# Windows batch files require CRLF line endings to function correctly.
+*.bat text eol=crlf
+*.cmd text eol=crlf

.github/agents/code-review.agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+---
+name: code-review
+description: Agent for performing formal reviews
+tools: [read, search, edit, execute, github, web, agent]
+user-invocable: true
+---
+
+# Code Review Agent
+
+This agent runs the formal review based on the review-set it's told to perform.
+
+# Formal Review Steps
+
+Formal reviews are a quality enforcement mechanism, and as such MUST be performed using the following four steps:
+
+1. Download the
+   <https://github.com/demaconsulting/ContinuousCompliance/raw/refs/heads/main/docs/review-template/review-template.md>
+   to get the checklist to fill in
+2. Use `dotnet reviewmark --elaborate [review-set]` to get the files to review
+3. Review the files all together
+4. Populate the checklist with the findings to `.agent-logs/reviews/review-report-[review-set].md` of the project.
+
+# Don't Do These Things
+
+- **Never modify code during review** (document findings only)
+- **Never skip applicable checklist items** (comprehensive review required)
+- **Never approve reviews with unresolved critical findings**
+- **Never bypass review status requirements** for compliance
+- **Never conduct reviews without proper documentation**
+- **Never ignore security or compliance findings**
+- **Never approve without verifying all quality gates**
+
+# Reporting
+
+Upon completion create a summary in `.agent-logs/[agent-name]-[subject]-[unique-id].md`
+of the project consisting of:
+
+```markdown
+# Code Review Report
+
+**Result**: <SUCCEEDED/FAILED>
+
+## Review Summary
+
+- **Review Set**: [Review set name/identifier]
+- **Review Report File**: [Name of detailed review report generated]
+- **Files Reviewed**: [Count and list of files reviewed]
+- **Review Template Used**: [Template source and version]
+
+## Review Results
+
+- **Overall Conclusion**: [Summary of review results]
+- **Critical Issues**: [Count of critical findings]
+- **High Issues**: [Count of high severity findings]
+- **Medium Issues**: [Count of medium severity findings]
+- **Low Issues**: [Count of low severity findings]
+
+## Issue Details
+
+[For each issue found, include:]
+- **File**: [File name and line number where applicable]
+- **Issue Type**: [Security, logic error, compliance violation, etc.]
+- **Severity**: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
+- **Description**: [Issue description]
+- **Recommendation**: [Specific remediation recommendation]
+
+## Compliance Status
+
+- **Review Status**: [Complete/Incomplete with reasoning]
+- **Quality Gates**: [Status of review checklist items]
+- **Approval Status**: [Approved/Rejected with justification]
+```
+
+Return summary to caller.