-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
feat: use superchain config lockbox in portal #164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -20,10 +20,9 @@ import { IL1BlockInterop, ConfigType } from "interfaces/L2/IL1BlockInterop.sol"; | |
| contract OptimismPortalInterop is OptimismPortal2 { | ||
| constructor( | ||
| uint256 _proofMaturityDelaySeconds, | ||
| uint256 _disputeGameFinalityDelaySeconds, | ||
| address _sharedLockbox | ||
| uint256 _disputeGameFinalityDelaySeconds | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is the contract version well after this change?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah cause it hasn't been merged to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes but I mean, we undo a change, shouldn't we undo the version? |
||
| ) | ||
| OptimismPortal2(_proofMaturityDelaySeconds, _disputeGameFinalityDelaySeconds, _sharedLockbox) | ||
| OptimismPortal2(_proofMaturityDelaySeconds, _disputeGameFinalityDelaySeconds) | ||
| { } | ||
|
|
||
| /// @custom:semver +interop-beta.5 | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this getter adds a call now, I think it makes sense to have a new small test covering it