Add Argilla Integration #135
Conversation
|
This is an initial basic integration but we do hope to build upon this with the other open issues within Haystack :) |
|
hi @kursathalat . Thanks, this looks cool! Will take a look and review early next week. |
|
@annthurium. Thanks you for the review. If there is anything I can help too. |
| type: Monitoring | ||
| report_issue: https://github.com/argilla-io/argilla-haystack/issues | ||
| logo: /logos/argilla.png | ||
| version: Haystack 2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so the biggest issue I see is that this extension doesn't support Haystack 2.0. It was developed using 1.23.
Any chance you'd be up for refactoring it to support 2.0? We'd be happy to help or provide pointers. 2.0 doesn't have agents yet (although it's high-pri and on the roadmap.) 2.0 does support some chat endpoints for models that provide them (Gemini, Mistral, probably others) and it seems like those could be used instead of the Agent responses below.
Let me know what you're thinking. If you don't have bandwidth to refactor, I can proceed and review it as a 1.x extension. We will be making a big push for 2.0 in the coming months.
|
Hi, @annthurium I'll continue tackling this issue. From your point of view, what do you think is the best approach to align with Haystack 2.0? |
|
@sdiazlor there are a bunch of other integrations that support Haystack 2.0 that you could model your integration on: We also have 2.0 docs, tutorials, and cookbooks to get you started. If you have any more specific questions, feel free to reach out 😄 |
|
@annthurium thank you, I'll let you know :) |
Argilla offers human and model-in-the-loop workflows for LLM development. As previously pointed out in this issue, this PR adds an agent tool for Haystack.