Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[linux-6.6.y] crypto: x86/crc32c-intel - Don't match some Zhaoxin CPUs #262

Merged

Conversation

leoliu-oc
Copy link
Contributor

zhaoxin inclusion
category: feature
CVE: NA


The driver crc32c-intel match CPUs supporting X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2. On platforms with Zhaoxin CPUs supporting this X86 feature, when crc32c-intel and crc32c-generic are both registered, system will use crc32c-intel because its .cra_priority is greater than crc32c-generic.

When doing lmbench3 Create and Delete file test on partitions with ext4 enabling metadata checksum, found using crc32c-generic driver could get about 20% performance gain than using the driver crc32c-intel on some Zhaoxin CPUs.

This case expect to use crc32c-generic driver for these Zhaoxin CPUs to get performance gain, so remove these Zhaoxin CPUs support from crc32c-intel.

This patch was submitted to mainline kernel but not accepted by upstream maintainer whose reason is "Then create a BUG flag for it,".

We think this is not a CPU bug for Zhaoxin CPUs. So should patch the crc32c driver for Zhaoxin CPUs but not report a BUG.

zhaoxin inclusion
category: feature
CVE: NA

----------------------------------------------------------------

The driver crc32c-intel match CPUs supporting X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2.
On platforms with Zhaoxin CPUs supporting this X86 feature,
when crc32c-intel and crc32c-generic are both registered,
system will use crc32c-intel because its .cra_priority is greater
than crc32c-generic.

When doing lmbench3 Create and Delete file test on partitions with
ext4 enabling metadata checksum, found using crc32c-generic driver
could get about 20% performance gain than using the driver
crc32c-intel on some Zhaoxin CPUs.

This case expect to use crc32c-generic driver for these Zhaoxin CPUs
to get performance gain, so remove these Zhaoxin CPUs support from
crc32c-intel.

This patch was submitted to mainline kernel but not accepted by upstream
maintainer whose reason is "Then create a BUG flag for it,".

We think this is not a CPU bug for Zhaoxin CPUs. So should patch the
crc32c driver for Zhaoxin CPUs but not report a BUG.

Signed-off-by: leoliu-oc <[email protected]>
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zccrs for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @leoliu-oc. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@opsiff opsiff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@opsiff
Copy link
Member

opsiff commented Jun 13, 2024

/lgtm

@opsiff opsiff merged commit cdad279 into deepin-community:linux-6.6.y Jun 13, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 在新增的条件判断中,使用了未定义的常量 X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXINX86_VENDOR_CENTAUR,需要确认这些常量是否已经在代码库中定义。
  • 新增代码中没有对 c->x86c->x86_model 的范围进行限制,可能会导致整数溢出问题。
  • 新增代码中没有处理 c->x86_vendorX86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN 的情况,可能会导致未定义行为。

是否建议立即修改:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants