LoongArch: Add cpufreq driver and ls2k500sfb driver support #143
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @sterling-teng. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: zhangtianyang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: liuyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chong Qiao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chong Qiao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chong Qiao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]>
Update deepin_loongarch_desktop_defconfig and loongson3_defconfig. Signed-off-by: Chong Qiao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]>
sterling-teng
force-pushed
the
linux-6.6.y
branch
from
4218324
to
9142b40
Compare
| if (cpufreq_get_current_driver()) | ||
| return -EEXIST; | ||
|
|
||
| if (cpufreq_supported_detect()) { |
|
/ok-to-test |
deepin pr auto reviewThis is the Linux 3.15-rc1 source code for the simplefb driver, which is The simplefb driver is a simple framebuffer driver for the Linux graphics The simplefb driver supports the following formats: 16-bit RGB555, 32-bit The driver is designed to be used with the fbcon API, which is a framework The simplefb driver is designed to work on systems with an LS2K500SuperMarioBros |
Avenger-285714
merged commit 0b4b9d5
into
deepin-community:linux-6.6.y
Include follow 5 commits: * 0b4b9d5 LoongArch: Update defconfig 17d60be LoongArch: fix ls2k500 bmc not work when installing iso e020f90 ipmi: add ls2k500 bmc ipmi support. 0d6b46e fbdev: add ls2k500sfb driver for ls2k500 bmc. a6a3487 cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for LoongArch Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit e7f3187 ] Recently, when running './test_progs -j', I occasionally hit the following errors: test_lwt_redirect:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_redirect_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) deepin-community#142/2 lwt_redirect/lwt_redirect_normal_nomac:FAIL deepin-community#142 lwt_redirect:FAIL test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_reroute_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_join 0 nsec deepin-community#143/2 lwt_reroute/lwt_reroute_qdisc_dropped:FAIL deepin-community#143 lwt_reroute:FAIL The netns_create() definition looks like below: #define NETNS "ns_lwt" static inline int netns_create(void) { return system("ip netns add " NETNS); } One possibility is that both lwt_redirect and lwt_reroute create netns with the same name "ns_lwt" which may cause conflict. I tried the following example: $ sudo ip netns add abc $ echo $? 0 $ sudo ip netns add abc Cannot create namespace file "/var/run/netns/abc": File exists $ echo $? 1 $ The return code for above netns_create() is 256. The internet search suggests that the return value for 'ip netns add ns_lwt' is 1, which matches the above 'sudo ip netns add abc' example. This patch tried to use different netns names for two tests to avoid 'ip netns add <name>' failure. I ran './test_progs -j' 10 times and all succeeded with lwt_redirect/lwt_reroute tests. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Stable-dep-of: 16b795cc5952 ("selftests/bpf: Fix redefinition errors compiling lwt_reroute.c") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit e7f3187 ] Recently, when running './test_progs -j', I occasionally hit the following errors: test_lwt_redirect:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_redirect_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) #142/2 lwt_redirect/lwt_redirect_normal_nomac:FAIL #142 lwt_redirect:FAIL test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_reroute_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_join 0 nsec #143/2 lwt_reroute/lwt_reroute_qdisc_dropped:FAIL #143 lwt_reroute:FAIL The netns_create() definition looks like below: #define NETNS "ns_lwt" static inline int netns_create(void) { return system("ip netns add " NETNS); } One possibility is that both lwt_redirect and lwt_reroute create netns with the same name "ns_lwt" which may cause conflict. I tried the following example: $ sudo ip netns add abc $ echo $? 0 $ sudo ip netns add abc Cannot create namespace file "/var/run/netns/abc": File exists $ echo $? 1 $ The return code for above netns_create() is 256. The internet search suggests that the return value for 'ip netns add ns_lwt' is 1, which matches the above 'sudo ip netns add abc' example. This patch tried to use different netns names for two tests to avoid 'ip netns add <name>' failure. I ran './test_progs -j' 10 times and all succeeded with lwt_redirect/lwt_reroute tests. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Stable-dep-of: 16b795cc5952 ("selftests/bpf: Fix redefinition errors compiling lwt_reroute.c") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
No description provided.