CI: Add patch check by using build kernel x86-64 and arm64 #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Modify a GitHub action workflow to check pull requests and push by build kernel
|
Self hosted runner CI depends package [ used to init new runner instance ] : |
Closed
MingcongBai
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2024
MingcongBai
merged commit e3d8c7a
into
deepin-community:deepin/v6.9.6
1 of 3 checks passed
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit 668c040 ] When the torture_type is set srcu or srcud and cb_barrier is non-zero, running the rcutorture test will trigger the following warning: [ 163.910989][ C1] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 [ 163.910994][ C1] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/1 [ 163.910999][ C1] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0 [ 163.911002][ C1] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [ 163.911005][ C1] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 163.911007][ C1] irq event stamp: 30964 [ 163.911010][ C1] hardirqs last enabled at (30963): [<ffffffffabc7df52>] do_idle+0x362/0x500 [ 163.911018][ C1] hardirqs last disabled at (30964): [<ffffffffae616eff>] sysvec_call_function_single+0xf/0xd0 [ 163.911025][ C1] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffabb6475f>] copy_process+0x16ff/0x6580 [ 163.911033][ C1] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 163.911038][ C1] Preemption disabled at: [ 163.911039][ C1] [<ffffffffacf1964b>] stack_depot_save_flags+0x24b/0x6c0 [ 163.911063][ C1] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc4-rt4-yocto-preempt-rt+ #3 1e39aa9a737dd024a3275c4f835a872f673a7d3a [ 163.911071][ C1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 163.911075][ C1] Call Trace: [ 163.911078][ C1] <IRQ> [ 163.911080][ C1] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xd0 [ 163.911089][ C1] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 163.911095][ C1] __might_resched+0x36f/0x530 [ 163.911105][ C1] rt_spin_lock+0x82/0x1c0 [ 163.911112][ C1] spin_lock_irqsave_ssp_contention+0xb8/0x100 [ 163.911121][ C1] srcu_gp_start_if_needed+0x782/0xf00 [ 163.911128][ C1] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x70 [ 163.911136][ C1] ? debug_object_active_state+0x336/0x470 [ 163.911148][ C1] ? __pfx_srcu_gp_start_if_needed+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911156][ C1] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911165][ C1] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_barrier_cbf+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911188][ C1] __call_srcu+0x9f/0xe0 [ 163.911196][ C1] call_srcu+0x13/0x20 [ 163.911201][ C1] srcu_torture_call+0x1b/0x30 [ 163.911224][ C1] rcu_torture_barrier1cb+0x4a/0x60 [ 163.911247][ C1] __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x267/0xca0 [ 163.911256][ C1] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_barrier1cb+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911281][ C1] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 163.911288][ C1] __sysvec_call_function_single+0x7d/0x280 [ 163.911295][ C1] sysvec_call_function_single+0x93/0xd0 [ 163.911302][ C1] </IRQ> [ 163.911304][ C1] <TASK> [ 163.911308][ C1] asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1b/0x20 [ 163.911313][ C1] RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x17/0x20 [ 163.911326][ C1] RSP: 0018:ffff888001997dc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 163.911333][ C1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffffae618b51 [ 163.911337][ C1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffaea80920 RDI: ffffffffaec2de80 [ 163.911342][ C1] RBP: ffff888001997dc8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed100d740cad [ 163.911346][ C1] R10: ffffed100d740cac R11: ffff88806ba06563 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 163.911350][ C1] R13: ffffffffafe460c0 R14: ffffffffafe460c0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 163.911358][ C1] ? ct_kernel_exit.constprop.3+0x121/0x160 [ 163.911369][ C1] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xc4/0x150 [ 163.911376][ C1] arch_cpu_idle+0x9/0x10 [ 163.911383][ C1] default_idle_call+0x7a/0xb0 [ 163.911390][ C1] do_idle+0x362/0x500 [ 163.911398][ C1] ? __pfx_do_idle+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911404][ C1] ? complete_with_flags+0x8b/0xb0 [ 163.911416][ C1] cpu_startup_entry+0x58/0x70 [ 163.911423][ C1] start_secondary+0x221/0x280 [ 163.911430][ C1] ? __pfx_start_secondary+0x10/0x10 [ 163.911440][ C1] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x17f/0x18b [ 163.911455][ C1] </TASK> This commit therefore use smp_call_on_cpu() instead of smp_call_function_single(), make rcu_torture_barrier1cb() invoked happens on task-context. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit f1e197a ] trace_drop_common() is called with preemption disabled, and it acquires a spin_lock. This is problematic for RT kernels because spin_locks are sleeping locks in this configuration, which causes the following splat: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 449, name: rcuc/47 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2 5 locks held by rcuc/47/449: #0: ff1100086ec30a60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x105/0x210 #1: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0xbf/0x130 #2: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x11c/0x210 #3: ffffffffb394a160 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch+0x360/0xc70 #4: ff1100086ee07520 (&data->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 irq event stamp: 139909 hardirqs last enabled at (139908): [<ffffffffb1df2b33>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x63/0x80 hardirqs last disabled at (139909): [<ffffffffb19bd03d>] trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x26d/0x290 softirqs last enabled at (139892): [<ffffffffb07a1083>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x103/0x170 softirqs last disabled at (139898): [<ffffffffb0909b33>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0x93/0x1f0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffffb1de786b>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0xab/0x2e0 CPU: 47 PID: 449 Comm: rcuc/47 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-rt1+ #7 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R650/0Y2G81, BIOS 1.6.5 04/15/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __might_resched+0x21e/0x2f0 rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x130 ? trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x80 ? __pfx_trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x26a/0x2e0 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x10/0x10 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_kfree_skb_hit+0x15/0x20 trace_kfree_skb+0xe9/0x150 kfree_skb_reason+0x7b/0x110 skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x8a/0x520 ... trace_drop_common() also disables interrupts, but this is a minor issue because we could easily replace it with a local_lock. Replace the spin_lock with raw_spin_lock to avoid sleeping in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <[email protected]> Reported-by: Hu Chunyu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit af0cb3f ] Xiumei and Christoph reported the following lockdep splat, complaining of the qdisc root lock being taken twice: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#598 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- swapper/2/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888177190110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&sch->q.lock); lock(&sch->q.lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by swapper/2/0: #0: ffff888135a09d98 ((&in_dev->mr_ifc_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x11a/0x510 #1: ffffffffaaee5260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c0/0x1ed0 #2: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70 #3: ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 #4: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#598 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 __lock_acquire+0xfdd/0x3150 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x540 _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 tcf_mirred_act+0x82e/0x1260 [act_mirred] tcf_action_exec+0x161/0x480 tcf_classify+0x689/0x1170 prio_enqueue+0x316/0x660 [sch_prio] dev_qdisc_enqueue+0x46/0x220 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1615/0x2e70 ip_finish_output2+0x1218/0x1ed0 __ip_finish_output+0x8b3/0x1350 ip_output+0x163/0x4e0 igmp_ifc_timer_expire+0x44b/0x930 call_timer_fn+0x1a2/0x510 run_timer_softirq+0x54d/0x11a0 __do_softirq+0x1b3/0x88f irq_exit_rcu+0x18f/0x1e0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x90 </IRQ> This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc lockdep key to silence false warnings. This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb: it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still holding the qdisc root lock. v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet) CC: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]> CC: Xiumei Mu <[email protected]> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#451 Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7dc06d6158f72053cf877a82e2a7a5bd23692faa.1713448007.git.dcaratti@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit f6944d4 ] Lockdep reports the below circular locking dependency issue. The mmap_lock acquisition while holding pci_bus_sem is due to the use of copy_to_user() from within a pci_walk_bus() callback. Building the devices array directly into the user buffer is only for convenience. Instead we can allocate a local buffer for the array, bounded by the number of devices on the bus/slot, fill the device information into this local buffer, then copy it into the user buffer outside the bus walk callback. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc5+ torvalds#39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ CPU 0/KVM/4113 is trying to acquire lock: ffff99a609ee18a8 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] but task is already holding lock: ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 __might_fault+0x5c/0x80 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x60 vfio_pci_fill_devs+0x9f/0x130 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_walk_wrapper+0x45/0x60 [vfio_pci_core] __pci_walk_bus+0x6b/0xb0 vfio_pci_ioctl_get_pci_hot_reset_info+0x10b/0x1d0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x1cb/0x400 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #2 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 down_read+0x3e/0x160 pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus.part.0+0x33/0x2d0 pci_reset_bus+0xdd/0x160 vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset+0x256/0x270 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_ioctl_pci_hot_reset_groups+0x1a3/0x280 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x3b5/0x400 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&vdev->memory_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 down_write+0x3b/0xc0 vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock+0x1c/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_basic_config_write+0x281/0x340 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_config_do_rw+0x1fa/0x300 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_config_rw+0x75/0xe50 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0xea/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] vfs_write+0xea/0x520 __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x90/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0 validate_chain+0x465/0x530 __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0 vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] __do_fault+0x31/0x160 do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0 __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720 handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460 fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0 follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &vdev->vma_lock --> pci_bus_sem --> &mm->mmap_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: block dm-0: the capability attribute has been deprecated. CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(pci_bus_sem); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&vdev->vma_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by CPU 0/KVM/4113: #0: ffff99a25f294888 (&iommu->lock#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_dma_do_map+0x60/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] #1: ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 4113 Comm: CPU 0/KVM Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ torvalds#39 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T640/04WYPY, BIOS 2.15.1 06/16/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x131/0x150 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0 ? add_chain_cache+0x10a/0x2f0 ? __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 validate_chain+0x465/0x530 __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] __do_fault+0x31/0x160 do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0 __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720 handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460 fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0 follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250 ? __lock_release+0x5e/0x160 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250 ? lock_release+0x5f/0x120 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb/0x190 ? irqtime_account_irq+0x40/0xc0 ? __local_bh_enable+0x54/0x60 ? __do_softirq+0x315/0x3ca ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x97/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f8300d0357b Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 75 68 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f82ef3fb948 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f8300d0357b RDX: 00007f82ef3fb990 RSI: 0000000000003b71 RDI: 0000000000000023 RBP: 00007f82ef3fb9c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000561b7e0bcac2 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000200000000 R14: 0000381800000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Modify a GitHub action workflow to check pull requests and push by build kernel