Previously, we went by the jurisction of the containing CIPRS record … #471
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
georgehelman
force-pushed
the
correct_petition_district_allocation
branch
2 times, most recently
from
979c95b
to
06d5a5c
Compare
…ns because the filter condition was using the jurisdiction fo the CIPRS record rather than the jurisdiction of the record. I suspect this is an artifact of the time when we thought a CIPRS record had only one jurisdiction. We now know that it is possible for a CIPRS record to have both in the case of superseding indictments. The convictions petitions should go by the jurisdiction of the offense, rather than the CIPRS record
georgehelman
force-pushed
the
correct_petition_district_allocation
branch
from
06d5a5c
to
870427e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…when determining the jurisdiction of the offenses. However, it is possible for a CIPRS record to contain both district and superior court offenses in cases where the offense has a superseding indictment. We should always go by which section the offense is in (District Court Offense Information vs Superior Court Offense Information) when determining the offense's jurisdiction.