Removed few more duplicates. #390
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
marcfehling
force-pushed
the
duplicate
branch
from
7db1a93 to
8b46b19
Compare
marcfehling
force-pushed
the
duplicate
branch
from
8b46b19 to
e91feeb
Compare
|
This article made it four times into our publication list :-)
|
This was referenced Sep 4, 2022
bangerth
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bibercomplained about a few more duplicates.I don't know how it managed to identify them. Have a look at the duplicate entry from the 2017 list. Lots of the fields are similar, but none of them except thepagesfield matches character by character. I'm impressed.EDIT: It's actually just checking bibtex keys. There was a matching key in the previous year. It was just coincidence that I found another duplicate.