-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 944
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Example using a {% do return(...) %}
statement in a Jinja macro
#5247
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
github-actions
bot
added
content
Improvements or additions to content
size: small
This change will take 1 to 2 days to address
labels
Apr 8, 2024
dbeatty10
changed the title
Example using
Example using a Apr 8, 2024
do
tag (AKA expression-statement) that doesn't output a string{% do return(...) %}
statement in a Jinja macro
mirnawong1
reviewed
Apr 9, 2024
add diff ways to use return function
mirnawong1
reviewed
Apr 9, 2024
mirnawong1
reviewed
Apr 9, 2024
hey @dbeatty10 , looks awesome and made some suggested changes. would love your input! |
Co-authored-by: Mirna Wong <[email protected]>
Thanks for your suggestions @mirnawong1 -- I committed them, and they really improved it overall. Ready for another review. |
mirnawong1
reviewed
Apr 10, 2024
mirnawong1
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
content
Improvements or additions to content
size: small
This change will take 1 to 2 days to address
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Preview
What are you changing in this pull request and why?
There's a subtle difference between these two:
{{ return([1,2,3]) }}
(an expression that outputs a string){% do return([1,2,3]) %}
(a statement that does not output a string)This PR adds an example of using the
do
tag along with thereturn
function.More detail
The "do" extension (AKA expression-statements) adds a simple
do
tag to the template engine that works like a variable expression but ignores the return value.Put another way, there is a difference between expressions and statements in Jinja:
{{ ... }}
: Expressions are used when you want to output a string. You can use expressions to reference variables and call macros.{% ... %}
: Statements don't output a string. They are used for control flow, for example, to set up for loops and if statements, to set or modify variables, or to define macros.Checklist