-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In build command run unit tests before models #9273
In build command run unit tests before models #9273
Conversation
* init attempt of adding clean_up methods to basic and unique_id tests * swapping cleanup method drop of test_schema to unique_schema to test breakage on docs_generate test * moving the clean_up method down into class BaseDocsGenerate * remove drop relation for unique_schema * manually define alternate_schema for clean_up as not being seen as part of project_config * add changelog * remove unneeded changelog * uncomment line that generates new manifest and delete manifest our changes created * make sure the manifest test is deleted and readd older version of manifest.json to appease test * manually revert file to previous commit * Revert "manually revert file to previous commit" This reverts commit a755419.
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unit_testing_feature_branch #9273 +/- ##
===============================================================
+ Coverage 85.64% 86.90% +1.25%
===============================================================
Files 181 181
Lines 27274 27338 +64
===============================================================
+ Hits 23360 23758 +398
+ Misses 3914 3580 -334
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@@ -30,7 +30,3 @@ services: | |||
working_dir: /usr/app | |||
depends_on: | |||
- database | |||
|
|||
networks: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this change intentional? What does it do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "docker compose up -d database" doesn't work because it complains about it. Not sure what it did to start with.
* Initial implementation of unit testing (from pr #2911) Co-authored-by: Michelle Ark <[email protected]> * 8295 unit testing artifacts (#8477) * unit test config: tags & meta (#8565) * Add additional functional test for unit testing selection, artifacts, etc (#8639) * Enable inline csv format in unit testing (#8743) * Support unit testing incremental models (#8891) * update unit test key: unit -> unit-tests (#8988) * convert to use unit test name at top level key (#8966) * csv file fixtures (#9044) * Unit test support for `state:modified` and `--defer` (#9032) Co-authored-by: Michelle Ark <[email protected]> * Allow use of sources as unit testing inputs (#9059) * Use daff for diff formatting in unit testing (#8984) * Fix #8652: Use seed file from disk for unit testing if rows not specified in YAML config (#9064) Co-authored-by: Michelle Ark <[email protected]> Fix #8652: Use seed value if rows not specified * Move unit testing to test and build commands (#9108) * Enable unit testing in non-root packages (#9184) * convert test to data_test (#9201) * Make fixtures files full-fledged members of manifest and enable partial parsing (#9225) * In build command run unit tests before models (#9273) --------- Co-authored-by: Michelle Ark <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michelle Ark <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Emily Rockman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jeremy Cohen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kshitij Aranke <[email protected]>
resolves #9128
Problem
In the build command we want to be able to run unit tests first, before the model it tests, and skip the model if a unit test fails.
For selection purposes we want to keep the graph with the unit tests depending on the model. But for running the build command we want the opposite.
Solution
There were two alternatives for a solution here, and both of them have difficulties.
The most natural would be to change the graph to have the unit tests before the model, but that would be very strange for selection semantics, so we would have to have two separate dags, one with unit tests after the model and another with unit tests before the model. We could have modified the selection dag to look like the required execution dag, but that would be fairly complicated since every unit test would have to be inserted as parent of the model and itself be a child of every one of the model's parents. There were also concerns about performance, since adding test_edges to the build dag made things slower, and this solution would have increased the size of the dag even more.
The other alternative, and the one that's implemented here, is to insert the execution of the unit tests in before the execution of the model. This requires some refactoring of the way we "run" the job_queue, and some somewhat inelegant hacking of the build code. But is probably easier to understand than the graph hacking solution and doesn't have the performance risks.
Checklist