Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): unit test with 16c64g #17283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

everpcpc
Copy link
Member

@everpcpc everpcpc commented Jan 14, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

This change is Reviewable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles. label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Jan 14, 2025

PR Summary

  • Enhanced Resource Allocation for Unit Testing Job
    The resources assigned for unit testing tasks have been improved, from a specification of '8c32g' to a more capable '16c64g'. This means our tests now have more computing power and memory to execute, enabling them to potentially run quicker and handle larger tasks.

@everpcpc everpcpc merged commit 6bcfe09 into databendlabs:main Jan 14, 2025
10 checks passed
@everpcpc everpcpc deleted the fix-ci branch January 14, 2025 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants