Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move from setup.py to pyproject.toml #7622

Open
jakirkham opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Move from setup.py to pyproject.toml #7622

jakirkham opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

jakirkham commented Mar 7, 2023

Increasingly there is a move by Python projects to use pyproject.toml to declare their metadata and dependencies and away from setup.py. Raising this issue to start discussion around how to approach this in Dask.

dask/dask#10032

@jrbourbeau
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jakirkham! I'll suggest we consolidate conversation over in dask/dask#10032 for the time being. My guess is we'll end up doing the same thing, at the same time, in dask/dask and dask/distributed

graingert added a commit to graingert/distributed that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2023
graingert added a commit to graingert/distributed that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2023
@graingert
Copy link
Member

graingert commented Mar 8, 2023

@jakirkham which build tool do we want to use eventually? I have a PR open #7629 which uses setuptools and versioneer via PEP 517, but what is the end goal? Should we be aiming at hatch?

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Continuing to use setuptools and versioneer makes sense. If we want to move to something else, that can be handled as a separate discussion

graingert added a commit to graingert/distributed that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2023
graingert added a commit to graingert/distributed that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2023
graingert added a commit to graingert/distributed that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants