Skip to content

fix: same block core chain lock height - #979

Merged
QuantumExplorer merged 1 commit into
v0.25-devfrom
feat/sameBlockCoreChainLockHeight
Apr 26, 2023
Merged

fix: same block core chain lock height#979
QuantumExplorer merged 1 commit into
v0.25-devfrom
feat/sameBlockCoreChainLockHeight

Conversation

@QuantumExplorer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

// propose one
// This is done before all else

let core_chain_lock_update = match self.platform.core_rpc.get_best_chain_lock() {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should also check in ProcessProposal if received core chain lock height is valid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah there's a todo there already.

@QuantumExplorer
QuantumExplorer merged commit 941a1b5 into v0.25-dev Apr 26, 2023
@QuantumExplorer
QuantumExplorer deleted the feat/sameBlockCoreChainLockHeight branch April 26, 2023 13:18
@thephez thephez added this to the v0.25.0 milestone Oct 11, 2023
HashEngineering added a commit to HashEngineering/platform that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2026
…68e652)

Carries the wallet-scope born-spent attribution, the rescan reseed fix,
and the repair-span bound into this branch's engine.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants