feat: addresses on the Platform chain

[QuantumExplorer]

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
• I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

• I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

[github-actions]

❌ gRPC Query Coverage Report

================================================================================
gRPC Query Coverage Report - NEW QUERIES ONLY
================================================================================

Total queries in proto: 49
Previously known queries: 47
New queries found: 2

================================================================================

New Query Implementation Status:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✗ getAddressInfo                                NOT FOUND
✗ getAddressesInfos                             NOT FOUND

================================================================================
Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New queries implemented: 0 (0.0%)
New queries missing: 2 (100.0%)

Total known queries: 49
  - Implemented: 44
  - Not implemented: 4
  - Excluded: 1

Not implemented queries:
  - getAddressInfo
  - getAddressesInfos
  - getConsensusParams
  - getTokenPreProgrammedDistributions

Missing NEW queries:
  - getAddressInfo
  - getAddressesInfos

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/singleUseKeys

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[lklimek]

maybe we should move sign_create_witness() out of signer, into new trait

[lklimek]

Consider using Signer trait instead of providing private key everywhere. DPP should never receive private key bytes.