Skip to content

Conversation

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta force-pushed the cxx17-refac branch 2 times, most recently from 7609e74 to c62a67c Compare October 2, 2021 06:44
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2021

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta force-pushed the cxx17-refac branch 2 times, most recently from bb01d4f to 0d7ca82 Compare October 12, 2021 00:11
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2021 01:04
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta changed the title [WIP] Cxx17 refac Cxx17 refac Oct 12, 2021
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta marked this pull request as draft October 12, 2021 01:15
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@github-actions
Copy link

This Pull Request may conflict if the Pull Requests below are merged first.

#4650
conflictable files: src/validation.cpp

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 removed this from the 18 milestone Oct 17, 2022
@knst
Copy link
Collaborator

knst commented Feb 8, 2023

I moved valuable changes to new PR #5190.
Please, consider closing this one so far as most of remaining changes related to using std::optional vs Result (should be super-seeded by #5109)

PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2023
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This refactoring helps to make code more specific and clear.
There's using syntax feature from modern C++ such as 'enum class',
structure bindings in loops, declaration variables inside if/switch
statements, etc.


## What was done?
This PR is based on @PastaPastaPasta 's PR
#4472

There excluded changes related to using std::optional. Let's decide
firstly about `Result` class: #5109


## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: Pasta <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants