Import bug - Circular Dependencies #100
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
boukeversteegh
changed the title
… is flattened into two python packages
boukeversteegh
force-pushed
the
fix/circular-dependencies
branch
from
0af0cf4 to
23dcbc2
Compare
boukeversteegh
added
bug
nat-n
reviewed
Jul 4, 2020
nat-n
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Protobuf itself does not allow circular dependencies (
import "a.proto"inb.proto, andimport "b.proto"ina.proto).So why do we still get circular import errors in python? Because protobuf dependencies are on file-level, while betterproto dependencies are on package-level.
Example:
The proto messages depend on each other in a non-circular way:
Test and RootPackageMessage are in different files, but belong to the same package (root):
After grouping the packages into single files or modules, a circular dependency is created:
Because we don't know in advance which imports will cause a circular-dependency (as we currently do single-pass compiling), the only solution I see is to always use forward references (
"package.SomeType"), and have the import statements at the bottom.This PR implements that solution.