Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about user defined parallel diffusivity parameter in AMICO NODDI model #114

Closed
CallowBrainProject opened this issue Jun 5, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@CallowBrainProject
Copy link

Hello, several recent studies have suggested that the standard parallel diffusivity parameter in NODDI for intraneurite diffusion (1.7) is suboptimal for measuring gray and even white matter in some samples (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217118 and https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48671-7).

Is there a way to alter the diffusivity parameters of our model in AMICO for the NODDI model? Thank you for any suggestions you can provide.

Daniel

@MarioOcampo
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @CallowBrainProject ,
Yes, as it was commented in #97, you can modify the parameters to suit your needs.
The diffusivity parameters are dPar and dIso and can be modified with the function set().
Let us know if this does what you wanted.

Best.
Mario

@ejcanalesr
Copy link

Hi guys, I have an idea but it must be tested. For example, the fitting can be done by using many different parallel diffusivities (one by one). The optimal diffusivity should be the one producing a smaller residual (a better fitting to the data). This way, a different diffusivity per voxel could be used. However, this is going to increase the computation time linearly with the number of diffusivities. Anyway, this is something we may explore in the future, as this could solve the more important theoretical limitation of NODDI. What do you think? All the best, Erick

@CallowBrainProject
Copy link
Author

CallowBrainProject commented Jul 16, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants