-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
fix: vite-dev-server windows #25889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
fix: vite-dev-server windows #25889
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
69559fb
chore: update vite in system test
lmiller1990 ba0fe7d
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress into …
lmiller1990 ae64ae3
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress into …
lmiller1990 929958f
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress into …
lmiller1990 c331d5f
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress into …
lmiller1990 595c55c
fix: vite-dev-server on windows
lmiller1990 9321133
fix slash
lmiller1990 d0cd875
windows
lmiller1990 d900481
try to run windows again
lmiller1990 164b6e7
update
lmiller1990 0057775
chore: comment [skip ci]
lmiller1990 27ea5fc
update
lmiller1990 e27734b
Merge branch 'develop' into lmiller/fixing-vite-windows
lmiller1990 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was going to suggest a adding a comment here. The difference between the 2 lines is one character in the middle of a string, which is hard to notice at glance.
But we could also change the code so that the difference is more obvious? Something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be clearer to remove the OS check and just normalize the absolute path to ensure it doesn't have a leading slash before we work with it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess - my concern here is actually the fact we need a comment and a regular expression seems much more complex, or the string concatenation, both seem more complex than just a good old
if/elsestatement, where you can immediately glance and see the difference.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree we should add a comment here explaining why this is required, let me update that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I thought more - let's go with normalzing, it does look better, after all - thanks!