Skip to content

Conversation

waralexrom
Copy link
Member

Check List

  • Tests have been run in packages where changes made if available
  • Linter has been run for changed code
  • Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
  • Docs have been added / updated if required

@waralexrom waralexrom requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2025 14:11
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.63%. Comparing base (0fde75d) to head (b196a32).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9951   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.62%   84.63%           
=======================================
  Files         253      253           
  Lines       90049    90049           
=======================================
+ Hits        76204    76212    +8     
+ Misses      13845    13837    -8     
Flag Coverage Δ
cubesql 84.63% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@@ -877,7 +911,7 @@ const viewSchema = inherit(baseSchema, {
meta: Joi.any(),
})
]))
]).required(),
]),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure that having empty cubes (I mean without any includes) in view is ok?

console.log(JSON.stringify(res));

expect(res).toEqual(
expectedResult
);
return sqlAndParams;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How're you using it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To check final sql like expect(sqlAndParams[0]).not.toMatch(/CROSS.+JOIN/);

@waralexrom waralexrom force-pushed the tesseract-calc-groups branch from bf21e66 to 9f7b54e Compare September 17, 2025 10:45
@waralexrom waralexrom merged commit 3168f53 into master Sep 17, 2025
118 of 119 checks passed
@waralexrom waralexrom deleted the tesseract-calc-groups branch September 17, 2025 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants