Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: get unnecessary block result when only need header #1600

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Sep 23, 2024

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the ethermint component to enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary block results in header-related API calls.
  • Chores
    • Updated the version of the ethermint module in the dependency management files to the latest version, ensuring improved functionality and stability.

@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2024 01:19
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from yihuang and calvinaco and removed request for a team September 23, 2024 01:19
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the ethermint component across three files: CHANGELOG.md, go.mod, and gomod2nix.toml. Key changes include an improvement to avoid unnecessary block results in header-related API calls and updates to the version and hash of the github.com/evmos/ethermint dependency, reflecting the latest commit and timestamp.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Updated to document an improvement in the ethermint component related to header API calls.
go.mod, gomod2nix.toml Updated github.com/evmos/ethermint version from v0.6.1-0.20240913100216-dbc7eb41488c to v0.6.1-0.20240923011104-7e3076202e6d, including hash changes.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • calvinaco
  • yihuang

Poem

🐇 In the land of code so bright,
Changes hop with pure delight.
Ethermint's tune, a smoother call,
Dependencies dance, one and all.
With every update, we grow and play,
Hopping forward, come what may! 🌟


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28ea954 and cd38ea6.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (2)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • gomod2nix.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • go.mod
  • gomod2nix.toml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.12%. Comparing base (8b0d1ea) to head (cd38ea6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1600   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.12%   36.12%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines        7725     7725           
=======================================
  Hits         2791     2791           
  Misses       4585     4585           
  Partials      349      349           

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants