Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add nested commands #2

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 3, 2021
Merged

Add nested commands #2

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 3, 2021

Conversation

cristaloleg
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2 (91e990f) into main (ba9e95d) will decrease coverage by 1.44%.
The diff coverage is 90.47%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main       #2      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   98.55%   -1.45%     
===========================================
  Files            2        2              
  Lines          124      138      +14     
===========================================
+ Hits           124      136      +12     
- Misses           0        1       +1     
- Partials         0        1       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
acmd.go 98.23% <90.47%> (-1.77%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba9e95d...91e990f. Read the comment docs.

@cristaloleg cristaloleg changed the title Declare defaultUsage as func Add nested commands Oct 30, 2021
acmd_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cristaloleg
Copy link
Member Author

ping @crayoned @quasilyte

@cristaloleg cristaloleg merged commit 2cac635 into main Nov 3, 2021
@cristaloleg cristaloleg deleted the nested-commands branch November 3, 2021 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

What about subcommands
3 participants