Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor unit tests on package lock #374

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

creativeprojects
Copy link
Owner

@creativeprojects creativeprojects commented Jun 28, 2024

  • refactoring of unit tests on the package lock
  • commit generated mocks with a more recent version of mockery
  • remove obsolete golangci-lint configuration

a ping to localhost doesn't necessarily work on some firewalled computers
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The overall changes primarily involve minor version updates to code generation tools and significant refactoring of test functions for improved readability and structure. Specifically, the code generation tool mockery was updated from version v2.42.1 to v2.43.2 across multiple files, and the test functions in lock/lock_test.go were refactored to use a helper function for temporary file creation, alongside introducing parallel testing capabilities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go,
config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go,
config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go,
config/mocks/SectionInfo.go,
monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go,
schedule/mocks/Handler.go
Updated the version number in code generation comments from mockery v2.42.1 to v2.43.2. No modifications to exported or public entities.
lock/lock_test.go Refactored test functions to use a helper function for creating temporary files. Updated init function to check Windows platform using platform.IsWindows(). Added parallel testing in some test functions.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cfdca2 and 12f1a6b.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go (1 hunks)
  • config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go (1 hunks)
  • config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go (1 hunks)
  • config/mocks/SectionInfo.go (1 hunks)
  • lock/lock_test.go (14 hunks)
  • monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go (1 hunks)
  • schedule/mocks/Handler.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go
  • config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go
  • config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go
  • config/mocks/SectionInfo.go
  • monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go
  • schedule/mocks/Handler.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
lock/lock_test.go

285-285: 285-309 lines are duplicate of lock/lock_test.go:311-335

(dupl)


311-311: 311-335 lines are duplicate of lock/lock_test.go:285-309

(dupl)

Additional comments not posted (6)
lock/lock_test.go (6)

34-39: Well-implemented helper function for temporary files.

The getTempfile function correctly utilises t.TempDir() and logs the temporary file used, which enhances test traceability.


42-45: Refactoring to use helper function getTempfile is correctly implemented.

Using getTempfile ensures consistency in how temporary files are handled across tests.


74-76: Good use of getTempfile and correct error handling testing.

The test correctly handles scenarios where no PID is set, which is crucial for robustness.


90-92: Correct implementation of PID setting in tests.

The test ensures that the PID is set correctly and verifies it, which is essential for ensuring the lock's functionality.


107-109: Proper handling of multiple PID settings in tests.

This test effectively checks the behaviour when multiple PIDs are set, which is crucial for complex scenarios.


126-127: Effective testing of process completion.

The test correctly determines if a child process has finished, which is vital for process management.

lock/lock_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12f1a6b and e8ee5c4.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • lock/lock_test.go (15 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
lock/lock_test.go

26-26: don't use init function

(gochecknoinits)


[medium] 320-320: G204: Subprocess launched with a potential tainted input or cmd arguments

(gosec)

Additional comments not posted (16)
lock/lock_test.go (16)

15-15: Review of imports and global variable declaration

The imports added are necessary for the new functionalities introduced in the test file. Changing helperBinary from a constant to a variable is appropriate given the platform-dependent modification in the init function.

Also applies to: 22-22


36-42: Review of getTempfile function

The implementation of getTempfile is clear and effective, providing a reusable way to generate temporary files for tests, which enhances test isolation and cleanliness.


44-53: Review of TestLockIsAvailable function

The test is well-structured, making good use of parallel execution and the getTempfile helper. It correctly tests the lock acquisition functionality.


Line range hint 55-71: Review of TestLockIsNotAvailable function

This test is correctly designed to check the lock's behaviour when it is already acquired. It effectively uses assertions to validate the lock status and the identity of the lock holder.

Tools
golangci-lint

26-26: don't use init function

(gochecknoinits)


Line range hint 76-88: Review of TestNoPID function

The test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where no PID is associated with the lock. It uses the getTempfile helper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.


Line range hint 92-104: Review of TestSetOnePID function

The test is well-structured, setting a PID and verifying it through subsequent calls. It makes effective use of the getTempfile helper and parallel execution.


Line range hint 109-123: Review of TestSetMorePID function

This test correctly simulates setting multiple PIDs in sequence and validates that the last set PID is the one that is retrieved, demonstrating the lock's behaviour in handling multiple PIDs.


Line range hint 128-150: Review of TestProcessFinished function

The test effectively uses a signalled command to simulate a process scenario. It sets a PID, runs the command, and correctly asserts whether the process still exists, providing a clear validation of the process's end state.


Line range hint 152-175: Review of TestProcessNotFinished function

This test effectively simulates a scenario where a process is expected to be running. It uses the helperBinary to ensure the process runs for a sufficient duration and correctly asserts the process's state.


181-189: Review of TestForceLockIsAvailable function

This test is correctly structured to validate the functionality of forcefully acquiring a lock, using the getTempfile helper for setup and asserting the expected behaviour.


Line range hint 191-205: Review of TestForceLockWithNoPID function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted without any PID being set. It uses the getTempfile helper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.


Line range hint 207-229: Review of TestForceLockWithExpiredPID function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted with an expired PID. It uses the getTempfile helper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes, including the manual closure of the lockfile handle.


Line range hint 237-265: Review of TestForceLockWithRunningPID function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted with a running PID. It uses the helperBinary to ensure the process runs for a sufficient duration and correctly asserts the lock's behaviour in this situation.


Line range hint 266-279: Review of TestLockWithNoInterruption function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and released without any interruptions. It uses the helperBinary to ensure the process runs smoothly and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.


Line range hint 285-305: Review of TestLockIsRemovedAfterInterruptSignal function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and then removed after receiving an interrupt signal. It uses the helperBinary to ensure the process is interrupted correctly and asserts the expected outcomes.


Line range hint 311-333: Review of TestLockIsRemovedAfterInterruptSignalInsideShell function

This test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and then removed after receiving an interrupt signal inside a shell command. It uses the helperBinary to ensure the process is interrupted correctly and asserts the expected outcomes.

Tools
golangci-lint

[medium] 320-320: G204: Subprocess launched with a potential tainted input or cmd arguments

(gosec)

lock/lock_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lock/lock_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8ee5c4 and d605d19.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • lock/lock_test.go (13 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lock/lock_test.go

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d605d19 and addd36e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • lock/lock_test.go (13 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lock/lock_test.go

@creativeprojects creativeprojects merged commit 854f6c9 into master Jun 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@creativeprojects creativeprojects deleted the fix-lock-tests branch June 28, 2024 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant