add "profile" flag as an alias for "name" #357
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes focus on enhancing flag handling by standardizing the flag name "profile" to "name" for consistency throughout the codebase. Furthermore, the test functionality in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- flags.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
flags.go (1)
117-123: The implementation of the flag normalization function to alias "profile" to "name" is correct and efficient for the current use case. However, if you anticipate adding more aliases in the future, consider a more scalable approach, such as using a map to manage aliases.
|
This is quite verbose for 7 new lines of code 😆 |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #357 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.47% 71.48% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 121 121
Lines 12670 12699 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 9055 9077 +22
- Misses 3209 3214 +5
- Partials 406 408 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @creativeprojects, here are the interesting stats about the repository, rendered as a table:
These statistics provide a snapshot of the repository's size, the level of collaboration, and areas that might require attention or future work. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Count the number of authors in the codebase.
git shortlog -sn --all | wc -l
# Count the number of lines of code in the codebase using tokei.
tokei --output json
# Find all occurrences of the `TODO` keyword and count them.
rg -c $'TODO'
Length of output: 89925 |
|
CodeRabbit looks ok so far, I'll leave it and see if that helps. To be honest, I was saying the same thing about copilot to start with and now it's annoying me 😆 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/SectionInfo.go (1 hunks)
- monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go (1 hunks)
- schedule/mocks/Handler.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go
- config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go
- config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go
- config/mocks/SectionInfo.go
- monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go
- schedule/mocks/Handler.go
Fixes #287
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit