-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing '(' in formula #74
Comments
Dear John, thank you for your feedback on this topic and apologies for the late reply. The content within this repository is a verbatim copy of the SQL-99 Complete, Really book. In order to reproduce its original content, we will probably not make any changes to it. However, we could think about adding a custom errata section if that would fit your bill. Please submit a respective pull request if you think that would improve the situation.
This book reflects the SQL-99 standard, not the specific behavior of CrateDB. We are currently in the progress of improving the situation with the published SQL-99 book by giving it a more distinct look in order to avoid any confusion between CrateDB SQL and SQL-99. We will let you know as soon as this has been concluded. On the other hand, I would like to encourage you to create an issue over at https://github.com/crate/crate if you think you discovered a bug within CrateDB. With kind regards, |
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for your communication.
I don't know what a pull request is or how to do it.
In fact I would just create utter chaos if I try.
Please proceed as you would see fit to deal with this.
Many many thanks for your time.
…On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 10:06, Andreas Motl ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear John,
thanks for your feedback on this topic. The content within this repository
is a verbatim copy of the SQL-99 Complete, Really
<https://openlibrary.org/books/OL8128443M/SQL-99_Complete_Really> book.
In order to reproduce its original content, we will probably not make any
changes to it.
However, we could think about adding a custom *errata* section if that
would fit your bill. Please submit a respective pull request if you think
that would improve the situation.
Entered SELECT (1.000001 + 1.999990) * 11000; in crash command line in
Windows.
This book reflects the SQL-99 standard, not the specific behavior of
CrateDB. We are currently in the progress of improving the situation with
the published SQL-99 book by giving it a more distinct look in order to
avoid any confusion between CrateDB SQL and SQL-99. We will let you know as
soon as this has been concluded.
With kind regards,
Andreas.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#74 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE5VTQ7RJPDW7EKKMJVT55TU6G76PANCNFSM5L3GOVJQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
John Le Brasseur
073 157 5605
|
Documentation feedback
Text:
Example: Try passing the expression: 1.000001 + 1.999990) * 11000 to our calculator. Our proc gives the correct result: “33000.0000000”. The compilers we tested gave the wrong result: “32999.9901000”. (Remember that in SQL all the s in this expression are DECIMAL, not floating-point, s.)
Should read:
Example: Try passing the expression: (1.000001 + 1.999990) * 11000 to our calculator. Our proc gives the correct result: “33000.0000000”. The compilers we tested gave the wrong result: “32999.9901000”. (Remember that in SQL all the s in this expression are DECIMAL, not floating-point, s.)
Entered SELECT (1.000001 + 1.999990) * 11000; in crash command line in Windows.
Output:
+-----------+
| 32999.901 |
+-----------+
| 32999.901 |
+-----------+
Should be
“33000.0000000” ????
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: