Skip to content

Issues: cppalliance/decimal

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

40 Open 393 Closed
40 Open 393 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Boost Review: Remove the footgun of lossy conversion from decimal floating point types.
#846 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Explicit conversions need much better documentation for overflow behaviour
#845 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: code duplication part 2. Boost Review Collected Comments from Boost Review Period
#844 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Remove Code duplication
#843 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Rationalize traits class usage to make the code easier to read.
#842 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Make uint128 a non-detail type given that it is used in public interfaces.
#841 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Ensure that +0 and -0 are equivalent.
#840 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: consider delegating constructors where possible (for efficiency)
#839 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: if pow10 has a literal or constexpr argument, ensure that it is actually called in a constexpr context.
#838 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Under constrained public constructor?
#837 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: undocumented public constructor
#836 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Can we add (possibly explicit) construction from string literal?
#835 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Do the exponent_type typedefs need to be public?
#834 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: documentation improvements
#833 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Are concept names public?
#832 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: cstdio functions add little value.
#831 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Split into "use what you need" smaller headers.
#830 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Remove sprint support.
#829 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Allow implicit conversions for all conversions which do not lose precision
#828 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Boost Review: Literals should be in their own namespace.
#827 opened Jan 29, 2025 by jzmaddock
Use fixed width integers for fast types instead of fast integers Boost Review Collected Comments from Boost Review Period optimization
#826 opened Jan 28, 2025 by mborland
@mborland
Decode decimal types in one shot optimization
#824 opened Jan 24, 2025 by mborland
Add libstdc++ decimal wrapper Boost Review Collected Comments from Boost Review Period enhancement New feature or request
#819 opened Jan 23, 2025 by mborland
Incorrect division for values near zero. Boost Review Collected Comments from Boost Review Period Bug Something isn't working
#808 opened Jan 20, 2025 by libbooze
@mborland
2
Add Intel DFP library benchmarks using Intel Compiler Boost Review Collected Comments from Boost Review Period documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#807 opened Jan 20, 2025 by mborland
@mborland
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.