Skip to content

Indicate that rb-inotify and rb-fsevent aren't actually necessary - #1

Merged
cpennington merged 1 commit into
cpennington:add-rb-inotifyfrom
singingwolfboy:add-rb-inotify
Sep 18, 2013
Merged

Indicate that rb-inotify and rb-fsevent aren't actually necessary#1
cpennington merged 1 commit into
cpennington:add-rb-inotifyfrom
singingwolfboy:add-rb-inotify

Conversation

@singingwolfboy

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Once this gets into your branch, I'll be happy to approve https://github.com/edx/edx-platform/pull/946

cpennington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2013
Indicate that rb-inotify and rb-fsevent aren't actually necessary
@cpennington
cpennington merged commit 2103c4b into cpennington:add-rb-inotify Sep 18, 2013
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2014
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2014
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2014
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2014
This fixes a minor layout bug in edx-jsme 1.0. See:
jazkarta/edx-jsme#1

For convenience, the entire diff from the last release is included here:

diff --git a/CHANGES.rst b/CHANGES.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..32e0284
--- /dev/null
+++ b/CHANGES.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+===================
+edX-JSME Change Log
+===================
+
+1.0.1 (2014-09-17)
+------------------
+
+- Fix alignment issue with the correct/incorrect markers. (#1)
+
+1.0 (2014-07-28)
+----------------
+
+- Initial release.
diff --git a/edx_jsme/templates/jsmeinput.html b/edx_jsme/templates/jsmeinput.html
index 861b43f..5ceaf3d 100644
--- a/edx_jsme/templates/jsmeinput.html
+++ b/edx_jsme/templates/jsmeinput.html
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
     waitfor=""
     value="${value|h}"/>

+    <br/>
     <p id="answer_${id}" class="answer"></p>

     <p class="status">
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019
cpennington pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants