-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 397
Issue 736 fix attempt experiment #754
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
MarcoRossignoli
wants to merge
2
commits into
coverlet-coverage:master
from
MarcoRossignoli:issue_736
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At least for my test projects, moving the call to
IsDotNetCoreto https://github.com/tonerdo/coverlet/blob/master/src/coverlet.core/Instrumentation/ModuleTrackerTemplate.cs#L111 still solves my issue - and should address your concern about people who don't update their test sdk (#736 (comment)).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically, we could remove this whole if block, and replace
if (failedToCreateNewHitsFile)withif (failedToCreateNewHitsFile && !IsDotNetCore())It might be a safer change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cannot understand where this link pointing...can you rewrite it?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could work...I'm only scared about remove redundant "flush" on exit(I want to do it for a long time) because could hidden some latent bug that will lead to empty coverage file.
I'll take a look asap, busy weeks for me.
Thank's for investigation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated it to point at the file outside this pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And to hopefully add some clarification, I added a readme to that repo.
Let me try to pull your change with the mutex and build it in that repo (in a different branch) so I can demonstrate the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, got it to fail intermittently using the mutex commit: https://github.com/namely/CoverletErrorRepro/tree/use-coverlet-mutex
As stated in the readme, this fails roughly 1/3 times on my laptop. I've noticed our CI environment is much slower than my laptop at running tests, so it is perhaps exacerbating the problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank's for sample and for correct exception, that fix doesn't work my fault...synch is working but if thread acquired mutex inside tracker is killed wait on get coverage will fail for abandoned mutex and also if we catch that exception we cannot be sure that file was fully written so we can hit corrupted hit file.
The unique clean solution is the one in full patch or your idea of skip re-write if we're in .net core app because if we already called flush from collector the second one should be process exits(no app domain so no intermediate flushes expected and only one file creation expected for msbuild/.net tool with .net core runtime).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem! Let me know if I can help with this in any way.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now we've a complete analysis, I'll think about best and light solution, for now you can fork and use your idea.
Huge thanks!