Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: guarantee that max prefix length is < min prefix length + child size #369

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions go/ops.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ func (op *InnerOp) CheckAgainstSpec(spec *ProofSpec, b int) error {
return errors.New("spec.InnerSpec.ChildSize must be >= 1")
}

if spec.InnerSpec.MaxPrefixLength >= spec.InnerSpec.MinPrefixLength+spec.InnerSpec.ChildSize {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for what it is worth. Spec fields being validated against themselves are better off in a spec.Validate() function, but for the sake of minimizing changes, this approach makes sense to me

return errors.New("spec.InnerSpec.MaxPrefixLength must be < spec.InnerSpec.MinPrefixLength + spec.InnerSpec.ChildSize")
}

// ensures soundness, with suffix having to be of correct length
if len(op.Suffix)%int(spec.InnerSpec.ChildSize) != 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("InnerOp suffix malformed")
Expand Down
28 changes: 25 additions & 3 deletions rust/src/verify.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -203,7 +203,11 @@
);
ensure!(
inner_spec.child_size > 0,
"spec.InnerSpec.ChildSize must be >= 1"
"spec.inner_spec.child_size must be >= 1"

Check warning on line 206 in rust/src/verify.rs

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

rust/src/verify.rs#L206

Added line #L206 was not covered by tests
);
ensure!(
inner_spec.max_prefix_length < inner_spec.min_prefix_length + inner_spec.child_size,
"spec.inner_spec.max_prefix_length must be < spec.inner_spec.min_prefix_length + spec.inner_spec.child_size"
);
ensure!(
inner.suffix.len() % (inner_spec.child_size as usize) == 0,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -484,6 +488,11 @@
depth_limited_spec.min_depth = 2;
depth_limited_spec.max_depth = 4;


let mut max_prefix_length_too_large_spec = api::iavl_spec();
let inner_spec = max_prefix_length_too_large_spec.inner_spec.as_mut().unwrap();
inner_spec.max_prefix_length = 100;

let cases: HashMap<&'static str, ExistenceCase> = [
(
"empty proof fails",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -612,19 +621,32 @@
proof: ExistenceProof {
key: b"foo".to_vec(),
value: b"bar".to_vec(),
leaf: Some(leaf),
leaf: Some(leaf.clone()),
path: vec![
valid_inner.clone(),
valid_inner.clone(),
valid_inner.clone(),
valid_inner.clone(),
valid_inner,
valid_inner.clone(),
],
},
spec: depth_limited_spec,
valid: false,
},
),
(
"rejects inner spec with max prefix length >= min prefix lenght + child size",
colin-axner marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
ExistenceCase {
proof: ExistenceProof {
key: b"foo".to_vec(),
value: b"bar".to_vec(),
leaf: Some(leaf),
path: vec![valid_inner],
},
spec: max_prefix_length_too_large_spec,
valid: false,
},
),
]
.into_iter()
.collect();
Expand Down
Loading