-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: guarantee that max prefix length is < min prefix length + child size #369
Merged
colin-axner
merged 14 commits into
master
from
carlos/maxprefixlength-less-minprefixlength-plus+childsize
Sep 26, 2024
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac0743b
fix: guarantee that max prefix length is < min prefix length + child …
crodriguezvega 3d7762d
same fix for rust implementation
crodriguezvega 98f8721
add test for rust
crodriguezvega 277f4f4
lint
crodriguezvega 3ce23e4
Update rust/src/verify.rs
colin-axner 5b14cd6
chore: rust formatting
colin-axner e77f94e
proto: add inner op max prefix length restriction comment
colin-axner f733e75
test: add test for forging non existence proof
colin-axner 21a407e
fix: test
colin-axner b0cce5c
lint
colin-axner bdc032b
Merge branch 'master' into carlos/maxprefixlength-less-minprefixlengt…
colin-axner 58a39d5
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:cosmos/ics23 into carlos/maxprefi…
colin-axner 7babca7
test: add unit test for new restriction
colin-axner 2b6f34f
chore: update changelog
colin-axner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for what it is worth. Spec fields being validated against themselves are better off in a spec.Validate() function, but for the sake of minimizing changes, this approach makes sense to me