Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport: "feat: Added authz support for ics20 (#3079)" to v6.1.x release branch #3499

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

backport: "feat: Added authz support for ics20 (#3079)" to v6.1.x release branch #3499

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GAtom22
Copy link
Contributor

@GAtom22 GAtom22 commented Apr 21, 2023

Description

Backport authz support for ICS-20 to release/v6.1.x branch

closes: #XXXX

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cian Hatton <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Charleen Fei <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zaki Manian <[email protected]>
@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @GAtom22. Thanks for back porting this feature! If you need this in the v6 release line, would it work for you to actually backport to v6.2.x? Releasing this feature requires a minor version bump (thus we cannot release it as v6.1.1), but we should be releasing v6.2.0 next week. If you want, and to save you some time, we can add the backport label to this PR to open the PR automatically.

@GAtom22
Copy link
Contributor Author

GAtom22 commented Apr 25, 2023

Hi @GAtom22. Thanks for back porting this feature! If you need this in the v6 release line, would it work for you to actually backport to v6.2.x? Releasing this feature requires a minor version bump (thus we cannot release it as v6.1.1), but we should be releasing v6.2.0 next week. If you want, and to save you some time, we can add the backport label to this PR to open the PR automatically.

Hi @crodriguezvega, sounds good! let's include it in the v6.2.0 release. If you could backport the label would be great! Thanks a lot for your help!!

@GAtom22 GAtom22 closed this Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants