Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update package list #22063

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

docs: update package list #22063

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Oct 3, 2024

Description

ref: #21429

no change required for migrations

opened cosmos/vanity#81 due to missing vanity


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated documentation for Cosmos SDK v2, introducing new packages and enhancing existing descriptions.
    • Added new sections for "V2" packages and "Schema" for module state schemas.
    • Introduced a PostgreSQL indexer for improved state management.
    • Included SimApp v2 as a sample for the latest version.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded and clarified sections on Core, UX, and Utilities, along with package updates.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Oct 3, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2024 08:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Cosmos SDK documentation to include the introduction of version 2 (v2) packages and modifies existing package descriptions. Key changes include the addition of a new "V2" section listing several new packages, enhancements to the "Core" and "State Management" sections, and a renaming of the "Automation" section to "UX". The documentation now incorporates new packages such as Client/v2, Core/Testing, and Errors/v2, as well as updates to the example section with SimApp v2.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/build/packages/README.md - Updated package description for Core.
- Added new section V2 with multiple new packages.
- Expanded "State Management" to include Schema and PostgreSQL indexer.
- Renamed "Automation" to "UX" and added Client/v2.
- Added new packages: Core/Testing, Errors/v2, and SimApp v2.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: update tooling link #21973: Updates links related to tooling in the documentation, aligning with the main PR's updates to the Cosmos SDK documentation.
  • docs: tooling #22049: Enhances documentation related to tooling within the Cosmos SDK, relevant to the main PR's focus on updating package descriptions.
  • docs: update go module link #22037: Updates Go module links in the documentation, related to the main PR's updates including new package introductions.

Suggested labels

C:CLI, C:Confix

Suggested reviewers

  • sontrinh16
  • tac0turtle

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e6a43b and a3bb18f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/build/packages/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/build/packages/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/build/packages/README.md

[duplication] ~19-~19: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ore) - Implementation of the Cosmos SDK store * [Store/v2](https://pkg.go.dev/cosmossdk.io/sto...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/build/packages/README.md (5)

22-28: LGTM: New V2 section added with clear package descriptions.

The addition of the V2 section is a good improvement to the documentation. It clearly separates v2 packages and provides concise descriptions for each new package.


34-35: LGTM: New state management packages added.

The addition of the Schema and PostgreSQL indexer packages enhances the state management capabilities of the SDK. The descriptions are clear and concise.


37-39: LGTM: UX section renamed and new Client/v2 package added.

The renaming of the section from "Automation" to "UX" better reflects its content. The addition of the Client/v2 package, which powers AutoCLI, is a valuable improvement for user experience.


44-47: LGTM: New utility packages added.

The addition of the Core/Testing package for mocking SDK modules and the Errors/v2 package for error handling enhances the utility offerings of the SDK.


52-53: LGTM: SimApp v2 added to Example section.

The addition of SimApp v2 as the sample Cosmos SDK v2 chain, alongside the original SimApp, provides clear examples for both versions of the SDK. The emphasis on not importing these packages in applications is maintained, which is important for developers to understand.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~53-~53: The preposition “into” seems more likely in this position than the preposition “in”.
Context: ...in. This package should not be imported in your application.

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION_IN_INTO)

docs/build/packages/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@hieuvubk hieuvubk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 55ec58c Oct 3, 2024
80 of 81 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/packagelist branch October 3, 2024 10:18
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 55ec58c)
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2024
12 tasks
tac0turtle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants