feat(store/v2): pruning manager #20430
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@cool-develope has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 43 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PruningManager
participant CommitStore
participant IavlTree
User->>CommitStore: Commit()
CommitStore->>PruningManager: Signal Commit
PruningManager->>IavlTree: PausePruning()
IavlTree->>PruningManager: Pruning Paused
PruningManager-->>CommitStore: Commit Signal Processed
CommitStore-->>User: Commit Complete
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
@cool-develope your pull request is missing a changelog! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
store/v2/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modstore/v2/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (15)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/migration/manager_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/v2/pruning/manager.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/root/factory.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store.go (6 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/store.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/store.go (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (15)
store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/pruning/manager.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/root/factory.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/storage/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/migration/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/root/store_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/root/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (19)
store/v2/pruning/manager.go (1)
1-67: LGTM! Ensure theManagerstruct and its methods are integrated correctly with other components.store/v2/root/factory.go (1)
Line range hint
15-106: LGTM! Ensure theCreateRootStorefunction integrates correctly with other components.Verification successful
The
CreateRootStorefunction is correctly integrated inruntime/v2/builder.goto initialize the root store and set up the application manager. The context and usage align with the intended functionality.
runtime/v2/builder.go: Correctly initializesa.app.dbusingCreateRootStore.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `CreateRootStore` function with other components. # Test: Search for the usage of `CreateRootStore` function. Expect: Correct integration points. rg --type go $'CreateRootStore'Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the usage of `CreateRootStore` in `runtime/v2/builder.go`. # Extract the lines around the usage of `CreateRootStore` to understand its context. rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'CreateRootStore' runtime/v2/builder.goLength of output: 634
store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go (1)
17-24: LGTM! Ensure theNewCommitStoreintegrates correctly with the new pruning manager.Verification successful
To ensure the
NewCommitStoreintegrates correctly with the new pruning manager, we need to review its implementation instore/v2/commitment/store.goand check for references to the pruning manager.
The
NewCommitStorefunction implementation does not directly reference the pruning manager. However, there are references to the pruning manager instore/v2/root/store.go. We need to review these references to understand if the pruning manager is integrated withNewCommitStoreindirectly through other components.
The
NewCommitStorefunction does not directly reference the pruning manager. However, the pruning manager is integrated within thestore/v2/root/store.gofile, where it handles signaling commits. This suggests that the pruning manager's integration is managed at a higher level in the codebase, ensuring that theNewCommitStorefunction operates correctly within this context.
store/v2/root/store.go: Contains references to the pruning manager, indicating its role in signaling commits.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `NewCommitStore` with the new pruning manager. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go $'NewCommitStore'Length of output: 1095
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the implementation of `NewCommitStore` and check for references to the pruning manager. # Extract the implementation of `NewCommitStore` function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewCommitStore(trees map[string]Tree, db corestore.KVStoreWithBatch, logger log.Logger) (*CommitStore, error) { $$$ }' # Search for references to the pruning manager in the codebase. rg --type go 'pruning manager'Length of output: 1132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the references to the pruning manager in `store/v2/root/store.go`. # Extract lines around the references to the pruning manager for context. rg --type go --context 5 'pruning manager' store/v2/root/store.goLength of output: 1378
store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go (1)
Line range hint
11-111: LGTM! Ensure thePausePruningmethod and the interface implementation are integrated correctly with other components.Verification successful
The
PausePruningmethod is correctly integrated with other components in the codebase. The method is referenced and utilized instore/v2/store.go,store/v2/commitment/store.go, andstore/v2/pruning/manager.go, ensuring that the pruning process can be paused or resumed as needed.
store/v2/store.go: Defines thePausablePrunerinterface, which includes thePausePruningmethod.store/v2/commitment/store.go: Implements thePausePruningmethod in theCommitStorestruct, iterating overmultiTreesand invokingPausePruningon each tree that implementsPausablePruner.store/v2/pruning/manager.go: Uses thePausePruningmethod in theSignalCommitfunction to manage concurrent writes during pruning.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `PausePruning` method with other components. # Test: Search for the usage of `PausePruning` method. Expect: Correct integration points. rg --type go $'PausePruning'Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the usage and context of `PausePruning` in the identified files. # Display lines around the usage of `PausePruning` in store/v2/store.go rg --type go --context 5 'PausePruning' store/v2/store.go # Display lines around the usage of `PausePruning` in store/v2/commitment/store.go rg --type go --context 5 'PausePruning' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Display lines around the usage of `PausePruning` in store/v2/pruning/manager.go rg --type go --context 5 'PausePruning' store/v2/pruning/manager.goLength of output: 1376
store/v2/storage/store.go (2)
20-20: Implementation ofstore.Prunerinterface inStorageStorelooks good.
30-33: UpdatedNewStorageStorefunction signature simplifies initialization and aligns with the PR's objectives.store/v2/store.go (1)
82-96: Introduction ofPrunerandPausablePrunerinterfaces enhances control over the pruning process and supports dynamic management of state consistency.store/v2/migration/manager_test.go (2)
31-31: Changes in the initialization ofCommitStorereflect the updated constructor and align with the PR's objectives to simplify store setup in tests.Also applies to: 50-50
41-41: Initialization ofStorageStorein test setup correctly reflects the changes to its constructor in the main implementation.store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go (1)
22-22: UpdatedNewDBfunction in test suite correctly uses the newStorageStoreconstructor, maintaining consistency with main codebase changes.store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go (2)
28-28: UpdatedNewStorefunction in test suite reflects the main codebase changes, ensuring consistency and simplification in test setup.Also applies to: 33-33, 67-67, 132-132
152-154: Pruning logic in test case correctly implements and tests the intended functionality usingPruneOptions.store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (1)
17-17: Changes in test setup and migration logic inMigrateStoreTestSuitecorrectly integrate new components and reflect updates to store constructors, ensuring comprehensive testing of migration functionality.Also applies to: 45-45, 66-66, 72-72, 79-79, 82-82
store/v2/root/store_test.go (2)
16-16: Ensure the new importcosmossdk.io/store/v2/pruningis utilized appropriately in the tests.Verification successful
The
pruningpackage is imported and used in the test suite, specifically with thepruning.NewManagerfunction. This indicates that the new import is indeed utilized in the tests.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `pruning` package in the test suite. # Test: Search for the usage of the `pruning` package. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go $'pruning' store/v2/root/store_test.goLength of output: 127
48-48: Initialization ofStorageStoreshould be accompanied by tests that verify its interaction with the new pruning manager.store/v2/commitment/store.go (2)
31-31: TheCommitStorenow implementsstore.PausablePruner. Ensure that the implementation of the interface methods (PruneandPausePruning) is correct and adheres to the expected behavior.Verification successful
The
CommitStorecorrectly implements thePruneandPausePruningmethods as required by thestore.PausablePrunerinterface. The methods adhere to the expected behavior, ensuring proper functionality.
Prunemethod: Iterates through versions, deletes metadata, and prunes trees.PausePruningmethod: Pauses pruning for each tree that supports thePausablePrunerinterface.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct implementation of `store.PausablePruner` methods in `CommitStore`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `Prune` and `PausePruning`. Expect: Correct implementation according to interface definition. rg --type go $'func \(c \*CommitStore\) (Prune|PausePruning)' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `Prune` and `PausePruning` methods from `CommitStore`. # Extract the `Prune` method implementation. rg --type go --context 10 $'func (c *CommitStore) Prune(version uint64) (ferr error) {' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Extract the `PausePruning` method implementation. rg --type go --context 10 $'func (c *CommitStore) PausePruning(pause bool) {' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `Prune` and `PausePruning` methods from `CommitStore`. # Extract the `Prune` method implementation. rg --type go --context 10 'func \(c \*CommitStore\) Prune\(version uint64\) \(ferr error\) \{' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Extract the `PausePruning` method implementation. rg --type go --context 10 'func \(c \*CommitStore\) PausePruning\(pause bool\) \{' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 1292
286-286: Review the implementation ofPruneandPausePruningmethods to ensure they handle errors appropriately and perform the expected operations on the trees.Also applies to: 312-319
Verification successful
The implementations of the
PruneandPausePruningmethods have been reviewed. Both methods handle errors appropriately:
- The
Prunemethod checks for errors when deleting keys and writing the batch, returning the error if encountered. It also accumulates errors from pruning individual trees.- The
PausePruningmethod checks if each tree supports pausing pruning and calls thePausePruningmethod on those that do.No issues were found in the error handling of these methods.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in `Prune` and `PausePruning`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in `Prune` and `PausePruning`. Expect: Proper error handling. rg --type go $'if err != nil' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and extract the implementations of `Prune` and `PausePruning` methods in `store/v2/commitment/store.go`. # Search for the `Prune` method implementation. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (s *$_) Prune($_) $_ { $$$ }' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Search for the `PausePruning` method implementation. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (s *$_) PausePruning($_) $_ { $$$ }' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the method names `Prune` and `PausePruning` in `store/v2/commitment/store.go`. # Search for the `Prune` method. rg 'Prune' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Search for the `PausePruning` method. rg 'PausePruning' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 516
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the lines of code for the `Prune` and `PausePruning` methods from `store/v2/commitment/store.go`. # Extract lines for the `Prune` method. sed -n '288,311p' store/v2/commitment/store.go # Extract lines for the `PausePruning` method. sed -n '312,319p' store/v2/commitment/store.goLength of output: 785
store/v2/root/store.go (2)
281-285: Review the signaling to thepruningManagerduring the commit process to ensure it correctly handles the start and end of a commit.Also applies to: 314-318
Verification successful
The signaling to the
pruningManagerduring the commit process correctly handles both the start and end of a commit. The first call toSignalCommitwithtruesignals the start of a commit, and the second call withfalsesignals the end of a commit.
- Lines 281-285: Signal the start of a commit.
- Lines 314-318: Signal the end of a commit.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signaling process to `pruningManager` during commits. # Test: Search for the signaling logic in the commit process. Expect: Correct signaling. rg --type go $'SignalCommit' store/v2/root/store.goLength of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract surrounding lines of SignalCommit calls to understand the context rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'SignalCommit' store/v2/root/store.goLength of output: 852
47-49: TheStorestruct now includes apruningManager. Ensure that the initialization in theNewfunction correctly sets up thepruningManagerand that it is utilized appropriately in the rest of the class methods.Also applies to: 69-78
Verification successful
The
pruningManageris correctly initialized in theNewfunction of theStoreclass and is used in theSignalCommitmethod. TheSignalCommitmethod in thepruning.Manageris implemented to handle the start and end of a commit process, pausing and resuming pruning as necessary.
The
pruningManageris initialized in theNewfunction:return &Store{ logger: logger.With("module", "root_store"), initialVersion: 1, stateStorage: ss, stateCommitment: sc, pruningManager: pm, migrationManager: mm, telemetry: m, isMigrating: mm != nil, }, nilThe
SignalCommitmethod is implemented as follows:func (m *Manager) SignalCommit(start bool, version uint64) error { if scPausablePruner, ok := m.scPruner.(store.PausablePruner); ok { scPausablePruner.PausePruning(start) } if ssPausablePruner, ok := m.ssPruner.(store.PausablePruner); ok { ssPausablePruner.PausePruning(start) } if !start { return m.Prune(version) } return nil }The initialization and usage of
pruningManagerappear to be correctly implemented.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct setup and utilization of `pruningManager` in the `Store` class. # Test: Search for the usage of `pruningManager` in the `Store` class methods. Expect: Correct setup and utilization. rg --type go $'pruningManager' store/v2/root/store.goLength of output: 344
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of `pruningManager` in the `New` function and the implementation of `SignalCommit`. # Test: Search for the initialization of `pruningManager` in the `New` function. rg --type go 'New' store/v2/root/store.go # Test: Search for the implementation of `SignalCommit` method in the `pruning.Manager`. rg --type go 'SignalCommit'Length of output: 576
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `New` function and the `SignalCommit` method. # Extract the full implementation of the `New` function. rg --type go -A 20 'func New(' store/v2/root/store.go # Extract the full implementation of the `SignalCommit` method. rg --type go -A 20 'func (m *Manager) SignalCommit(' store/v2/pruning/manager.goLength of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `New` function and the `SignalCommit` method. # Extract the full implementation of the `New` function. rg --type go -A 20 'func New\(' store/v2/root/store.go # Extract the full implementation of the `SignalCommit` method. rg --type go -A 20 'func \(m \*Manager\) SignalCommit\(' store/v2/pruning/manager.goLength of output: 1004
| pm := pruning.NewManager(sc, ss, nil, nil) | ||
| rs, err := New(noopLog, ss, sc, pm, nil, nil) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The search results indicate that while pruning.NewManager is instantiated in the test file, there is no evidence that it is being used in conjunction with RootStore. This suggests that the integration of pruning.Manager with RootStore is not being tested.
- Ensure that tests verify the correct behavior of
RootStorewith the pruning manager integrated.
Analysis chain
The creation of RootStore now includes a pruning.Manager. Ensure that the tests verify the correct behavior of RootStore with the pruning manager integrated.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct behavior of `RootStore` with the pruning manager.
# Test: Search for tests that involve `RootStore` and `pruning.Manager`. Expect: At least one test.
rg --type go $'RootStore.*pruning.Manager' store/v2/root/store_test.go
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct behavior of `RootStore` with the pruning manager.
# Step 1: Search for `RootStore` instantiation in the test file.
rg --type go 'RootStore' store/v2/root/store_test.go
# Step 2: Search for `pruning.Manager` instantiation in the test file.
rg --type go 'pruning.Manager' store/v2/root/store_test.go
Length of output: 792
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct behavior of `RootStore` with the pruning manager.
# Step 1: Search for the instantiation of `RootStore` in the test file.
rg --type go 'New(noopLog, ss, sc, pm, nil, nil)' store/v2/root/store_test.go
# Step 2: Check if `pruning.Manager` is passed as a parameter to `RootStore`.
rg --type go 'pruning.NewManager' store/v2/root/store_test.go
Length of output: 185
| @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ func TestStorageTestSuite(t *testing.T) { | |||
| db.SetSync(false) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| return storage.NewStorageStore(db, nil, log.NewNopLogger()), err | |||
| return storage.NewStorageStore(db, log.NewNopLogger()), err | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The recent commits and PRs do not mention the new pruning manager, indicating that it might not be integrated yet. To ensure proper integration, the NewStorageStore function should be updated to include the new pruning manager if it is part of the intended changes.
- File:
store/v2/storage/store.go - Function:
NewStorageStore
Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure the NewStorageStore integrates correctly with the new pruning manager.
The search results indicate multiple instances of NewStorageStore with different signatures. To verify the integration with the new pruning manager, we need to inspect the definition of NewStorageStore and ensure it includes the new pruning manager.
The definition of NewStorageStore does not include the new pruning manager. This suggests that the integration might be missing or handled elsewhere. To confirm, we need to check for any recent changes or PRs that might include the new pruning manager integration.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `NewStorageStore` with the new pruning manager.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go $'NewStorageStore'
Length of output: 1189
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of `NewStorageStore` to check for integration with the new pruning manager.
# Test: Retrieve the definition of `NewStorageStore` function.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewStorageStore($_, $_) *$_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent changes or PRs related to the new pruning manager integration.
# Test: List recent commits and PRs to find references to the new pruning manager.
git log -n 10 --oneline
gh pr list --state merged --limit 10
Length of output: 1444
| @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ func TestStorageTestSuite(t *testing.T) { | |||
| s := &storage.StorageTestSuite{ | |||
| NewDB: func(dir string) (store.VersionedDatabase, error) { | |||
| db, err := New(dir) | |||
| return storage.NewStorageStore(db, nil, log.NewNopLogger()), err | |||
| return storage.NewStorageStore(db, log.NewNopLogger()), err | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The NewStorageStore function does not currently initialize the pruning manager. This is evident from the implementation found in store/v2/storage/store.go, which only initializes the logger and db fields of the StorageStore struct.
store/v2/storage/store.go:func NewStorageStore(db Database, logger log.Logger) *StorageStore {
To ensure proper integration with the new pruning manager, the NewStorageStore function should be updated to initialize the pruning manager as well.
Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure the NewStorageStore integrates correctly with the new pruning manager.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `NewStorageStore` with the new pruning manager.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go $'NewStorageStore'
Length of output: 1189
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `NewStorageStore` with the new pruning manager.
# Test: Search for references to the pruning manager within the `NewStorageStore` function and its usage.
rg --type go 'pruningManager' --context 5
Length of output: 9794
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of the pruning manager within the `NewStorageStore` function.
# Test: Search for the implementation of the `NewStorageStore` function.
rg --type go 'func NewStorageStore' --context 10
Length of output: 1172
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (17)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go (3 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/database.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/migration/manager.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/migration/manager_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/root/factory.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store.go (7 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go
- store/v2/commitment/store.go
- store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go
- store/v2/migration/manager_test.go
- store/v2/root/factory.go
- store/v2/root/migrate_test.go
- store/v2/root/store.go
- store/v2/root/store_test.go
- store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go
- store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go
- store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (5)
store/v2/database.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/migration/manager.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (5)
store/v2/database.go (1)
30-31: The addition of theWriteChangesetmethod in theCommitterinterface aligns well with the PR's objectives to enhance commitment management.store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1)
30-30: The use oflog.NewNopLogger()in the instantiation ofStorageStorefor benchmark tests is a good practice, as it prevents logging overhead from affecting performance measurements.Also applies to: 38-38, 42-42
store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go (1)
1-173: ThePruningManagerTestSuiteis comprehensive and well-structured, effectively testing various scenarios including error handling and state verification post-pruning. This ensures the reliability and robustness of the pruning functionality.store/v2/migration/manager.go (1)
236-236: The updates in theSyncmethod to handle changesets committed during the migration process are crucial for maintaining data consistency. This is a key enhancement in the migration functionality.store/v2/storage/storage_test_suite.go (1)
25-25: The addition of theNewDBfield to theStorageTestSuitestruct enhances the flexibility and reusability of the test suite by allowing dynamic instantiation of storage backends. This is a valuable improvement for testing different configurations.
| @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ | |||
| package pruning | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you add a small readme/doc.go on the design with a small diagram on how this is meant to be used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
store/v2/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modstore/v2/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (18)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go (3 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go (2 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/migration/manager.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/migration/manager_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/pruning/README.md (1 hunks)
- store/v2/pruning/manager.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/root/factory.go (5 hunks)
- store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (4 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store.go (7 hunks)
- store/v2/root/store_test.go (3 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/storage/store.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree.go
- store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go
- store/v2/commitment/store_test_suite.go
- store/v2/migration/manager.go
- store/v2/migration/manager_test.go
- store/v2/pruning/manager.go
- store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go
- store/v2/root/store.go
- store/v2/root/store_test.go
- store/v2/storage/pebbledb/db_test.go
- store/v2/storage/rocksdb/db_test.go
- store/v2/storage/sqlite/db_test.go
- store/v2/storage/storage_bench_test.go
- store/v2/storage/store.go
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (1)
store/v2/pruning/README.md (1)
Near line 17: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...rinterface defines thePausePruning` method which is used to pause the pruning proc...
Rule ID: AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA
Markdownlint (1)
store/v2/pruning/README.md (1)
52: null
Files should end with a single newline character
Path-based Instructions (4)
store/v2/pruning/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"store/v2/root/factory.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (10)
store/v2/pruning/README.md (2)
1-14: The introduction and description of thePruningManagerandPruneOptionsare clear and well-documented.
23-52: ThePruning Flowdiagram provides a clear visual representation of the process. Good use of the mermaid diagram to illustrate complex interactions.store/v2/root/factory.go (3)
Line range hint
1-43: The imports and type definitions are appropriate and well-organized.
Line range hint
53-106: TheCreateRootStorefunction is well-implemented with clear error handling and initialization logic for different storage types. Good use of helper functionensureDirfor directory management.
Line range hint
1-106: The overall structure and formatting of the file conform to the Uber Golang style guide.store/v2/root/migrate_test.go (3)
Line range hint
1-18: The imports and initial setup for theMigrateStoreTestSuiteare appropriate and well-organized, providing a solid foundation for the tests.
Line range hint
46-83: The test functions in theMigrateStoreTestSuiteare well-implemented, covering a variety of scenarios and properly handling errors. Good use of assertions to ensure state correctness.
Line range hint
1-83: The overall structure and formatting of the test file are well-maintained and follow best practices for test code.store/v2/commitment/store.go (2)
Line range hint
31-319: The method implementations inCommitStore, includingPausePruningandPrune, correctly adhere to their respective interfaces. The implementation details are consistent with the expected behavior described in the PR.
Line range hint
1-320: The overall structure and formatting of the file conform to the Uber Golang style guide.
* main: (120 commits) chore: update protoc-gen-swagger to protoc-gen-openapiv2 (#20448) ci: Add GitHub Action for go mod tidy and mocks (#20501) chore: Address linter issues (#20486) fix: wrap errors in auto CLI service registration (#20493) chore: fix comment (#20498) chore: fix the note box syntax error (#20499) feat(server/v2): introduce cometbft v2 (#20483) refactor(x/upgrade): migrate to appmodule.VersionMap (#20485) docs: code guidelines changes (#20482) feat(cosmovisor): load cosmovisor configuration from toml file (#19995) perf(math): Significantly speedup Dec quo truncate and quo Roundup (#20034) fix: Bump CometBFT versions (#20481) refactor(core): remove redundant ExecMode (#20322) feat(store/v2): pruning manager (#20430) chore: force reload sonar cloud (#20480) refactor(x/accounts): reuse calculated sum in `func safeAdd` (#20458) refactor: remove `defer` in loop (#20223) ci: remove livness test (#20474) build(deps): Bump bufbuild/buf-setup-action from 1.32.1 to 1.32.2 (#20477) chore: migrate a few diagrams to mermaid (#20473) ...
Description
Closes: #20429
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PruningManagerfor managing state storage and commitment pruning based on chain height.Refactor
pruneOptsparameter from various initialization functions.Tests