Skip to content

test: regression test on VotingPeriodProposalKey deletion #15368

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

facundomedica
Copy link
Member

Description

Follow up to #15356 adding a test in which we activate the voting period, delete the proposal and try to vote in the deleted proposal (this vote would have passed before and now it gets rejected).


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@facundomedica facundomedica requested a review from a team March 13, 2023 13:40
@facundomedica facundomedica added the backport/v0.47.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.47's next stable release label Mar 13, 2023
@github-prbot github-prbot requested review from a team, kocubinski and likhita-809 and removed request for a team March 13, 2023 13:40
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. just need to make golangci-lint happy :)

Copy link
Contributor

@samricotta samricotta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice! lgtm

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Mar 14, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 0282cfe into main Mar 14, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the facu/add-test-gov-actprop branch March 14, 2023 09:40
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
## Description

Follow up to #15356 adding a test in which we activate the voting period, delete the proposal and try to vote in the deleted proposal (this vote would have passed before and now it gets rejected).

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 0282cfe)

# Conflicts:
#	x/gov/keeper/proposal_test.go
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. backport/v0.47.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.47's next stable release C:x/gov
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants