Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup #12153

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

@ValarDragon ValarDragon commented Jun 4, 2022

Description

This PR is intended to simplify the overhead of the simulation manager setup, in a non-breaking way.
Also removes some of the complexity out of trying to do this independently in your own app, by having a re-usable helper method in the module package (where it belongs) (osmosis-labs/osmosis#1664)

If this conflicts with your plans for app-wiring feel free to just close this. However, as far as I can tell, its still helpful w/ app wiring for app-specific overrides and legacy modules.


Author Checklist

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests - no simulation manager tests overall?
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@ValarDragon ValarDragon requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2022 14:38
types/module/simulation.go Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
Copy link
Member

@tac0turtle tac0turtle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

huge fan of this. Ideally person simulations will be at the module level but might as well get these easy wins in. Can you add a change log entry

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

julienrbrt commented Jun 6, 2022

@ValarDragon did you meant to backport this to 0.45 or 0.46 (or both)?

@alexanderbez alexanderbez added the backport/0.46.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.46's next stable release label Jun 6, 2022
@alexanderbez alexanderbez merged commit 544afb6 into main Jun 6, 2022
@alexanderbez alexanderbez deleted the dev/simplify_sm_setup branch June 6, 2022 13:17
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	simapp/app.go
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	simapp/app.go
tac0turtle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	simapp/app.go

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
randy75828 pushed a commit to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
…osmos#12159)

* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (cosmos#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	simapp/app.go

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Eengineer1 pushed a commit to cheqd/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
…osmos#12159)

* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (cosmos#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	simapp/app.go

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
p0mvn pushed a commit to osmosis-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
…osmos#12159)

* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (cosmos#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
mattverse pushed a commit to osmosis-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
…osmos#12159) (#358)

* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (cosmos#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
…osmos#12159)

* refactor: Simplify SimulationManager setup (cosmos#12153)

(cherry picked from commit 544afb6)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	simapp/app.go

* fix conflict

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/0.46.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.46's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants