feat: ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (backport #11551)
#11574
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![mergify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10562?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…gov proposal (#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go
fedekunze
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2022
|
@fedekunze this doesn't have your change, it has test fixes and comments, does this need to be merged? |
fedekunze
reviewed
Apr 8, 2022
Comment on lines
-174
to
+176
| if plan.Height <= ctx.BlockHeight() { | ||
| // NOTE: allow for the possibility of chains to schedule upgrades in begin block of the same block | ||
| // as a strategy for emergency hard fork recoveries | ||
| if plan.Height < ctx.BlockHeight() { |
JimLarson
pushed a commit
to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2022
…gov proposal (backport cosmos#11551) (cosmos#11574) * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (cosmos#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
randy75828
pushed a commit
to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2022
…gov proposal (backport cosmos#11551) (cosmos#11574) * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (cosmos#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
randy75828
pushed a commit
to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2022
…gov proposal (backport cosmos#11551) (cosmos#11574) * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (cosmos#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
Eengineer1
pushed a commit
to cheqd/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2022
…gov proposal (backport cosmos#11551) (cosmos#11574) * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (cosmos#11551) Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
JeancarloBarrios
pushed a commit
to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2024
…gov proposal (backport cosmos#11551) (cosmos#11574) * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (cosmos#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf4) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #11551 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 5b02bf4 has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com