-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How about ability to vary the mount point name? #19
Comments
You know - I might be able to do that. I could have an option for it to prompt for the name when mounting. I still think I'll have it default to the "standard" /Volumes mount location - but let the user specify a name. I'll see if I can whip up some code for that quick. -CorpNewt |
Wow! Talk about quick responses.
There’s also a misspelling, where “output” is misspelled as “oputput”, unless I already submitted that issue.
… On Oct 25, 2022, at 23:32, CorpNewt ***@***.***> wrote:
You know - I might be able to do that. I could have an option for it to prompt for the name when mounting. I still think I'll have it default to the "standard" /Volumes mount location - but let the user specify a name. I'll see if I can whip up some code for that quick.
-CorpNewt
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMW3MYUQT6BBWCNWNQICDWFCQ3RANCNFSM6AAAAAARORYUYU>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
Oops! Just saw you already fixed that one.
… On Oct 25, 2022, at 23:32, CorpNewt ***@***.***> wrote:
You know - I might be able to do that. I could have an option for it to prompt for the name when mounting. I still think I'll have it default to the "standard" /Volumes mount location - but let the user specify a name. I'll see if I can whip up some code for that quick.
-CorpNewt
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMW3MYUQT6BBWCNWNQICDWFCQ3RANCNFSM6AAAAAARORYUYU>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
Hmmm - in just testing using So - while I could implement some code asking you for a specific mount point - you wouldn't see that reflected in the volume name at all. Pretty sure that defeats the purpose, unfortunately. -CorpNewt |
I believe I've seen some tool that somehow mounted the EFI so that it showed up in Finder as ESP. Maybe it can't be done directly from a shell command (that is, maybe it requires "real code")?
Or this is a false memory. Entirely possible! :-D
Galen
On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 11:44:43 PM EDT, CorpNewt ***@***.***> wrote:
Hmmm - in just testing using sudo diskutil mount -mountPoint /Volumes/whatever diskXsY in terminal - it seems the volume name doesn't change - just the actual mount point. I suppose that makes sense though, as mounting multiple EFI partitions still shows them all as EFI in the Finder, even though all after the first are mounted at /Volumes/EFI N where N is an incremented number starting with 1.
So - while I could implement some code asking you for a specific mount point - you wouldn't see that reflected in the volume name at all. Pretty sure that defeats the purpose, unfortunately.
…-CorpNewt
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I found this on stackexchange but haven't tried it myself, and I don't know if there are any other side effects of The goal of the person who asked this question was to be able to mount an EFI and make its volume label to be
Maybe just creating the two hidden files would do the trick, perhaps avoiding anything undesired that |
It would really be handy to be able to specify a mount point name and/or to generate a default mount point name based on the device, for example, EFI on disk0s1 would be mounted as /Volumes/EFIdisk0s1 or similar.
This would make it much easier to distinguish between multiple EFI's mounted from different devices.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or does it not make sense? (I don't know much about how EFI partitions work.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: