Skip to content

Conversation

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor

@touchweb-vincent touchweb-vincent commented Nov 11, 2025

Clarified the impact of increasing anomaly score thresholds on WAF protections and emphasized the importance of maintaining a blocking threshold of 5.
Clarified the implications of increasing the anomaly score threshold and emphasized the importance of keeping the blocking threshold at or below 5.
Copy link
Member

@EsadCetiner EsadCetiner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not resolve comments that you haven't properly addressed, if you don't understand my request or disagree with it please speak up instead of marking it as resolved.

Right now your changes are very wordy, and is even confusing in some places.

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I’ve responded to all your points. I understood from another PR that you - or at least Max - preferred having discussions marked as resolved so you can keep track of progress. I can handle it differently with you if you prefer.

I’m now waiting for your feedback on my responses.

@EsadCetiner
Copy link
Member

@touchweb-vincent

I’ve responded to all your points.

I've tagged you in the comments you haven't addressed, I'm still waiting on them.

you - or at least Max - preferred having discussions marked as resolved so you can keep track of progress.

Yes, but you only mark a discussion marked as resolved once you are finished with it. Meaning you applied the suggestion, if you disagree with a suggestion or don't understand it you don't mark it as resolved, you ask follow up questions or express your disagreement until an agreement is come to.

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I’ve given you detailed explanations about why I disagreed with some points, and the two change requests have been marked as unresolved. I’m now waiting for your feedback.

@EsadCetiner
Copy link
Member

I’ve given you detailed explanations about why I disagreed with some points

I don't see where you gave such an explanation, all I see are my own comments
image

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't understand why you don't see it.

@EsadCetiner
Copy link
Member

@touchweb-vincent You haven't published your review, that's why it says "Pending" in orange above your message.

You need to publish your review, you can do that by clicking the files tab and "submit review" at the top right:
image

@touchweb-vincent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I had never seen this GitHub behavior in the past 3 years! Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@EsadCetiner EsadCetiner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, I understand your changes much better now. How do these suggestions sound?

@EsadCetiner EsadCetiner merged commit eda0689 into coreruleset:main Dec 8, 2025
1 check passed
@touchweb-vincent touchweb-vincent deleted the patch-2 branch December 9, 2025 06:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants