tectonic: pull in default network policy (utility), enable ingress controller operator #2917
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
hey @squeed can you |
|
this is related to this? #2921 |
squeed
force-pushed
the
ingress-controller-operator
branch
from
21408e5 to
759a6a9
Compare
|
Updated, PTAL. This replaces #2921 |
|
retest this please. aws |
|
retest this please. removed the wrong label :p |
squeed
force-pushed
the
ingress-controller-operator
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a907ce3 to
26a6c53
Compare
|
Updated the PR to bump the utility operator as well. |
squeed
force-pushed
the
ingress-controller-operator
branch
from
26a6c53 to
584f47a
Compare
|
retest this please. aws |
|
Just need to merge coreos-inc/tectonic-operators#285, then we tests shoooould pass. |
|
ok, will wait for that to retrigger this one |
squeed
force-pushed
the
ingress-controller-operator
branch
from
584f47a to
cbce76f
Compare
squeed
changed the title
|
Okay, fixed the other random problems that were keeping this from going green. As part of the process, I needed to bump the utility operator. So this PR also pulls in a default network policy for tectonic-system |
|
Nice, most tests pass. What's with the "exp" failure? Not sure how to diagnose. |
|
@squeed i retriggered this test lets see if is not a flaky |
|
all green on aws! yessss! |
|
retest this please. |
|
for govcloud I need to do some cleanup there |
|
azure failure looks like a flake. |
|
govcloud will not work for now :/ |
|
Is this ready to merge? |
This moves the ingress controller in to its own namespace.
squeed
force-pushed
the
ingress-controller-operator
branch
from
cbce76f to
00ef75a
Compare
4 participants
This moves the ingress controller to its own namespace.