Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport from coq-nix-toolbox #3309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2025
Merged

Backport from coq-nix-toolbox #3309

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

proux01
Copy link
Contributor

@proux01 proux01 commented Jan 25, 2025

@proux01 proux01 requested a review from RalfJung as a code owner January 25, 2025 15:30
@proux01
Copy link
Contributor Author

proux01 commented Jan 25, 2025

Cc @palmskog FYI

@RalfJung
Copy link
Contributor

RalfJung commented Jan 25, 2025 via email

@palmskog
Copy link
Collaborator

@RalfJung the release manager guarantees that if something is compatible with 9.0+rc1, then it will be compatible with 9.0.X. That's one of the main points of the RC period.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Contributor

And I guess that means that RC has happened? (I checked coq-club and couldn't find an announcement.)

In that case, assuming std++ and Iris actually build with the RC, 👍 from my side.

@proux01 proux01 force-pushed the nix-backport branch 2 times, most recently from fc3325a to 4d31139 Compare January 25, 2025 18:35
@palmskog
Copy link
Collaborator

@proux01 proux01 merged commit 858ab2d into coq:master Jan 25, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@proux01 proux01 deleted the nix-backport branch January 25, 2025 18:49
@Zimmi48
Copy link
Member

Zimmi48 commented Jan 26, 2025

@proux01 It's really cool that you did that, as I think it is going to help with the Rocq Platform preparation!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants