packit: Restore podman-next target list #162
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martinpitt
requested review from
rhatdan,
lsm5,
dougsland,
Yarboa and
sandrobonazzola
as code owners
I removed them in commit 62c1ee9 with ignoring that this is a deliberate subset of targets, as this project doesn't build in e.g. Fedora 37 or C8S. Put them back. Signed-off-by: Martin Pitt <[email protected]>
|
@lsm5 @sandrobonazzola PTAL |
My bad. I should have caught that 😞 |
|
LGTM'd too soon. We'll need s390x too. |
ugh, no it's already there. LGTM final. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I removed them in commit 62c1ee9 with ignoring that this is a deliberate subset of targets, as this project doesn't build in e.g. Fedora 37 or C8S. Put them back.
I was checking recent podman-next builds after the landed packit PRs today, and noticed the build failures. Sorry for the blunder!
This is the net diff of packit.yaml between before PR #160 and this (ignore the tests/e2e bits, that PR landed in between)
@lsm5