Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix panic when checking len on nil object #7448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Aug 25, 2020

issue #7444 describes a problem where an image does not have a manifest file and cannot be processed by our library correctly. the origin of the panic is because we are checking the len of a nil object's attribute. this is a temporary fix to protect from the panic in the future. the origin of the problem is more interesting and requires more work when the code author returns from pto.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 25, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 25, 2020

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM, and I appreciate your having saved me the effort of applying the patch on my test VM.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 26, 2020

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 26, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Aug 28, 2020

@baude Please rebase to fix flakes.

issue containers#7444 describes a problem where an image does not have a manifest file and cannot be processed by our library correctly.  the origin of the panic is because we are checking the len of a nil object's attribute.  this is a temporary fix to protect from the panic in the future.  the origin of the problem is more interesting and requires more work when the code author returns from pto.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 28, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2020
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Aug 28, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 28, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a5085b0 into containers:master Aug 28, 2020
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Added a backport label (Cc @mheon )

@baude baude deleted the issue7444 branch May 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants