-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
podman-remote gobbles stdin #4095
Labels
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Comments
edsantiago
added a commit
to edsantiago/libpod
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2019
Test had incorrectly been disabled for all podman; it should've been disabled only for podman-remote. Fixed that, and fixed the problem that was causing failures: podman-remote is gobbling up stdin (containers#4095), so no tests were actually being run at all, or only one. Fixed by redirecting input on the run_podman invocation. Added, as backup, a confirmation mechanism to ensure that all expected tests are being run. Note that test is reenabled, but the output check is disabled for podman-remote due to containers#4096; this at least lets us check exit status. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
The
[UPDATE] adding |
baude
added a commit
to baude/podman
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2019
when running a container remotely, we should only be sending stdin when running with --interactive; otherwise use nil. Fixes: containers#4095 Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
label
Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
podman-remote unnecessarily (and incorrectly) reads its stdin:
Compare to plain podman, or to anything else:
Sometimes, but not always, the
podman varlink
process spits out an error:I believe that fixing this bug will go a long way toward clearing up many of the weird CI failures currently being seen.
podman-1.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 but this is a longstanding bug
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: