Skip to content

Conversation

@baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Mar 26, 2019

on the remote client, if a user wants to know the rootfs size of a
container, a -s should be passed. this corrects a behavior where size
was shown by default.

Fixes #2765

Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M labels Mar 26, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Mar 26, 2019

Code LGTM

Copy link
Member

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, assuming happy tests

@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #2758) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 26, 2019
on the remote client, if a user wants to know the rootfs size of a
container, a -s should be passed.  this corrects a behavior where size
was shown by default.

Fixes containers#2765

Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M labels Mar 26, 2019
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Mar 26, 2019

would someone merge this?

@haircommander
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 26, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit aa07901 into containers:master Mar 26, 2019
@baude baude deleted the issue2765 branch December 22, 2019 18:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants