Skip to content

Conversation

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member

if we are creating an intermediate mount namespace, we need to be able
to do the cleanup in the parent ns, so that the mounted storage can be
correctly umounted and we don't leak the mount.

Depends on: cri-o/cri-o#2160

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano gscrivan@redhat.com

if we are creating an intermediate mount namespace, we need to be able
to do the cleanup in the parent ns, so that the mounted storage can be
correctly umounted and we don't leak the mount.

Depends on: cri-o/cri-o#2160

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S labels Mar 22, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Mar 28, 2019

@giuseppe Do we want to drop this in favor of #2730

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

@mheon yes, I think #2730 is cleaner

@giuseppe giuseppe closed this Mar 28, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants