Skip to content

chore(ci): trigger frontend image rebuild on constructorfabric namespace - #159

Merged
cyberantonz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/trigger-image-rebuild
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): trigger frontend image rebuild on constructorfabric namespace#159
cyberantonz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/trigger-image-rebuild

Conversation

@cyberantonz

@cyberantonz cyberantonz commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

After the cyberfabric → constructorfabric migration merged earlier today, no frontend file has changed, so .github/workflows/docker.yml hasn't published a new image under the new ghcr.io/constructorfabric/insight-front namespace. The old ghcr.io/cyberfabric/insight-front tags are stranded.

docker.yml runs on every push to main with no path filter, so a comment-only README touch is enough to retrigger.

Test plan

  • Merge to main and confirm the Build & Push job pushes ghcr.io/constructorfabric/insight-front:<date>-<sha> and :latest.
  • Confirm the dispatch-umbrella job fires constructorfabric/insight's build-images.yml with frontend_tag=<new tag> set so the umbrella chart's frontend subchart appVersion bumps to match.

After the cyberfabric → constructorfabric migration merged, no frontend
file has changed, so docker.yml hasn't published a new image under the
new ghcr.io/constructorfabric/insight-front namespace. A comment-only
touch to README.md is enough to retrigger the workflow because
docker.yml runs on every push to main with no path filter.

The umbrella chart dispatch (constructorfabric/insight build-images.yml
with frontend_tag=<new tag>) will follow once this lands.

Signed-off-by: Anton Zelenov <antonz@constructor.tech>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a CI rebuild marker comment in README.md to document and retrigger the frontend image build in response to the constructorfabric/* namespace flip occurring on 2026-06-09.

Changes

CI Rebuild Marker

Layer / File(s) Summary
CI rebuild marker comment
README.md
A timestamped CI rebuild marker comment (2026-06-09) is inserted to document and trigger the frontend image build on the namespace flip to constructorfabric/*.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • constructorfabric/insight-front#158: Both PRs update README.md in the context of the constructorfabric/* namespace flip (main PR adds a CI rebuild marker, while the retrieved PR retargets docs to constructorfabric), indicating the same migration-driven change set.

Poem

🐰 A marker laid down with care and precision,
To whisper to CI: "Rebuild with vision!"
The namespace has flipped on this June day,
And the frontend shall build the modern way.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically summarizes the main change: triggering a frontend image rebuild for the constructorfabric namespace migration.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/trigger-image-rebuild

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cyberantonz
cyberantonz merged commit 3cdf09f into main Jun 9, 2026
2 checks passed
@cyberantonz
cyberantonz deleted the chore/trigger-image-rebuild branch June 24, 2026 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant