-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config: update operator to use release tags for enclave-cc and kata #283
config: update operator to use release tags for enclave-cc and kata #283
Conversation
Update the operator to point to the v0.8.0 tagged enclave-cc bundles for runtime-payload Signed-off-by: Chris Porter <[email protected]>
/test |
Update the operator to point to the kata-container bundle hash associated with v0.8.0. Note: This intentionally uses the runtime-payload-ci hash for this release due to issues creating the runtime-payload bundles. Signed-off-by: Chris Porter <[email protected]>
/test |
The runtime-payload bundles didn't get created due to mishaps in the CI (see here and here). Nevertheless, the v0.8.0 tag was already applied for Note this means that the fix from @littlejawa's PR 8400 is part of v0.8.0 (good), but @fidencio's PR 8415 to tweak the workflow is not (which should be OK, as we're moving off of those files soon). Before merging, we probably want @wainersm's operator fix, and then the reqs-payload will need to be updated a final time here. |
/test-s390x |
@portersrc, we don't need to wait for @wainersm's fixes, to be honest, that can come later, but before the release. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks @portersrc!
/cc @stevenhorsman @bpradipt @wainersm for a review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @portersrc ,
I liked the comment that you left on the commit:
Note: This intentionally uses the runtime-payload-ci hash for this release
due to issues creating the runtime-payload bundles.
LGTM.
This covers step 19 from the release checklist here