base_url CEP

[dholth]

Allow repodata.json and packages to live in separate places.

[baszalmstra]

I think this is great but what is the usecase for this?

[dholth]

Anaconda is experimenting with having a collection of historical repodata.json pointing at the (supposed to be immutable) set of packages. I could have used this while developing jlap, which also had a test proxy to fetch repodata.json more quickly than conda was able to. Someone might also be interested in subsetting repodata.json for policy reasons.

[baszalmstra]

I wonder if conda would work properly if the package keys were sha hashes so that you could point the whole thing at a content-addressed store instead of a server with normal filenames.

I would love to be able to directly use SHA hashes! At prefix we also use a content-addressable store, but we do the conversion on the server side now (which is a bit of a waste). We could also add a URL to each entry with a download URL. Or we can template the base_url to be able to construct a complete URL that might also include something other than the filename. WDYT?

[baszalmstra]

In rattler we do assume that the keys (filenames) are properly formatted and sorted for some speed optimizations so just using sha hashes wouldn't work there.

[baszalmstra]

I implemented this CEP in rattler: conda/rattler#322

[baszalmstra]

Should we maybe start a vote on this CEP?

[jaimergp]

Agreed, this would be awesome to have.

[jezdez]

@conda-incubator/steering

This vote falls under the "Enhancement Proposal Approval" policy of the conda governance policy,
please vote and/or comment on this proposal at your earliest convenience.

It needs 60% of the Steering Council to vote yes to pass.

To vote, please leave yes, no or abstain as comments below.

If you have questions concerning the proposal, you may also leave a comment or code review.

This vote will end on 2024-01-18, End of Day, Anywhere on Earth (AoE).

Note: This is an extended voting period to accommodate the start of the year and the complexity of the proposal.

[wolfv]

yes

[baszalmstra]

yes

[jezdez]

yes

[jaimergp]

yes

(first repodata_version bump!)

[chenghlee]

yes

[xhochy]

Yes

[ocefpaf]

Yes

[msarahan]

Yes

[wolfv]

@CJ-Wright @goanpeca @chenghlee @marcelotrevisani @jakirkham @mbargull @kkraus14 this is a reminder to please vote with YES / NO / ABSTAIN on this CEP :)

[marcelotrevisani]

Yes!

[mbargull]

Yes

[kkraus14]

yes

[mariusvniekerk]

yes

[CJ-Wright]

Yes
I am making this comment solely in my personal capacity and am not conveying any rights to any intellectual property of any third parties.

[wolfv]

Vote count:

• 13 yes
• 0 abstain
• 0 no

The steering council consists of 15 people.
That means, 86% have voted, and 100% have voted yes. This CEP is accepted! 🎉

[wolfv]

@dholth any last changes? Otherwise I or @jezdez should probably push the CEP (cep-15.md) to it's final name and merge to the repo.

[dholth]

LGTM, merge it.

[wolfv]

Done!