Add jxrlib from #6842

[hmaarrfk]

@csachs i pulled this from your PR #6842 to try and move things along slowly :D

Checklist

• License file is packaged (see here for an example)
• Source is from official source
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged)
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Build number is 0
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details)
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/jxrlib) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[npavlovikj]

I would suggest the summary to be more descriptive since it appears in the channel info, something like:

summary: "jxrlib - JPEG XR Library by Microsoft, built from Debian hosted sources."

[npavlovikj]

You can remove the description section all together, and maybe add a note that the package is no longer maintained by MS, e.g.:

extra:
  notes: "This package seems to be no longer maintained by the original developer (Microsoft)."

[npavlovikj]

@hmaarrfk , the recipe LGTM. If you don't mind modifying it according the comments, I can merge it afterwards.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/jxrlib) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/jxrlib:

• The about section contained an unexpected subsection name. extra is not a valid subsection name.

[hmaarrfk]

thanks for the review.

[npavlovikj]

@hmaarrfk , sorry for not being more clear earlier - notes goes under the extra section, where the recipe-maintainers are.
So, please remove extra from here.

[npavlovikj]

Please add notes: "This package seems to be no longer maintained by the original developer (Microsoft)." before or after the recipe-maintainers.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/jxrlib) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/jxrlib:

• The extra section contained an unexpected subsection name. notes is not a valid subsection name.

[hmaarrfk]

Thanks for the review again.

are you ok with the linter failing?

[npavlovikj]

Ha, I use the notes section for bioconda recipes - I didn't know that it is bioconda-specific only.

I apologize for that - can you please remove the extra part completely, and add description as you had initially (just without the empty line)?

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/jxrlib) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/jxrlib:

• The about section contained an unexpected subsection name. decription is not a valid subsection name.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/jxrlib) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[npavlovikj]

Many thanks for the patience and the prompt updates @hmaarrfk ! The recipe LGTM, so I will merge it once the tests pass.

[hmaarrfk]

All good, happy to get this package along in conda-forge

[npavlovikj]

@hmaarrfk , I was not sure of the AppVeyor failure, but I was just told that as long as one win build passes, we are good, so I will go ahead and merge this PR.

Thank you for the contribution!

[hmaarrfk]

Thanks!