Scipy 1.9.0, with distutils#206
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
@rgommers @tylerjereddy |
|
woot |
|
excellent, thanks for testing! |
17be60f to
ea53ed6
Compare
|
@mattip, now that we have pypy builds again, I reran this. It looks like there are still some small issues to work out. However, if it's not easily fixable, I don't think we'll have to hold up the release for that. We've made do without pypy the last few months, so if 1.9.0 is released without initially, I don't think it'll be a big problem. In more detail, it looks like there's e.g. some file handle probably not being closed "enough" and causing import errors on windows: DetailsLinux has some apparent segfault/crash at least in and additionally there are two failing tests on linux/osx, one of them refcount-related, and one with (AFAICT) another too-specific error message regex. Details |
Agreed.
Can we skip that test on PyPy? The test generates a segfault, which is tricky to control.
Is this enough to fix the regex in the error message? I guess these fixes plus the ones already in the patches should be pushed to upstream for the 1.9.0 release... |
|
The windows error is going to be more involved, since there is a mixture of cython, deallocators, and temp files. Is there something obvious that changed between 1.8 and 1.9? |
…nda-forge-pinning 2022.07.29.16.12.45
|
I'm leaving out the pypy builds for now, but will open a PR after merging this one where we can readd them and figure out the remaining issues. |
Minimal alternative to #205, fully on distutils to be able to run test suite.
Ideally, we'll be able to move the unixes to meson already for 1.9.0 GA