Skip to content

Convert cmake-feedstock to v1 feedstock#244

Closed
lgray wants to merge 3 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
lgray:convert_feedstock_to_v1_recipe_format
Closed

Convert cmake-feedstock to v1 feedstock#244
lgray wants to merge 3 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
lgray:convert_feedstock_to_v1_recipe_format

Conversation

@lgray
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@lgray lgray commented Jul 3, 2025

This PR converts cmake-feedstock to a v1 recipe and switch the conda build tool to rattler-build.
It has been automatically generated with feedrattler v0.3.13.

Changes:

  • 📝 Converted meta.yaml to recipe.yaml
  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • 🔧 Updated conda-forge.yml to use rattler-build and pixi (optional)
  • 🔢 Bumped the build number
  • 🐍 Applied temporary fixes for python_min and python_version
  • 🔄 Rerender the feedstock with conda-smithy
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/recipe.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@lgray
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

lgray commented Jul 3, 2025

A reasonable improvement in build speed (though x86_64 linux didn't move), just wanted to see.
If you'd like to merge, please do so, if not I am fine with that.

@lgray lgray marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2025 18:16
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have much of a say here, but looks good to me :)

@lgray
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

lgray commented Feb 12, 2026

Let me redo this one since it's been 8 months.

@lgray lgray closed this Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants