-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 450
Add pytorch_scatter ci run
#1748
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add pytorch_scatter ci run
#1748
Conversation
|
@conda-forge/pytorch_scatter This is for conda-forge/pytorch_scatter-feedstock#74 The new aarch64 builds are hitting the timeout limit, see conda-forge/pytorch_scatter-feedstock#74 (comment) |
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| action: add_feedstock_output | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems accidental.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops! good catch, fixed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still seems to be included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤦 I didn't pay attention to the file path and just looked at the line number!
requests/pytorch_scatter-cirun.yaml
Outdated
| - cirun-openstack-cpu-medium | ||
| - cirun-openstack-cpu-large | ||
| - cirun-openstack-cpu-xlarge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need all three? oO
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry about that! I was thinking I would start with large and see if that works 😎
|
Hi @h-vetinari @wolfv - could you please take a look? many thanks! |
Guidelines for marking packages as broken:
instead of marking packages as broken. This alternative workflow makes environments more reproducible.
not technically broken and should not be marked as such.
but should be patched in the repo data and be marked unbroken later.
the maintainers only, we can allow packages to be marked broken more liberally.
conda-forge/core) try to make a decision on these requests within 24 hours.What will happen when a package is marked broken?
brokenlabel to the package. Themainlabel will remain on the package and this is normal.anaconda.orgCDN picks up the new patches, you will no longer be able to install the package from themainchannel.Checklist:
I want to mark a package as broken (or not broken):
I want to archive a feedstock:
I want to request (or revoke) access to an opt-in CI resource:
I want to copy an artifact following CFEP-3:
I want to add a package output to a feedstock: